Mental Health Issues and Illness and Substance Use Disorder (non-)disclosure to a Supervisor: a Cross-sectional Study on Beliefs, Attitudes and Needs of Military Personnel

Overview

Journal BMJ Open

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2023 Apr 12

PMID 37045564

Authors

Rebecca Bogaers

Elbert Geuze

Jaap van Weeghel

Fenna Leijten

D van de Mheen

N Greenberg

A D Rozema

Evelien Brouwers

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: Research suggests that military personnel frequently delay disclosing mental health issues and illness (MHI), including substance use disorder, to supervisors. This delay causes missed opportunities for support and workplace accommodations which may help to avoid adverse occupational outcomes. The current study aims to examine disclosure-related beliefs, attitudes and needs, to create a better understanding of personnel's disclosure decision making.

Design: A cross-sectional questionnaire study among military personnel with and without MHI. Beliefs, attitudes and needs regarding the (non-)disclosure decision to a supervisor were examined, including factors associated with (non-)disclosure intentions and decisions. Descriptive and regression (logistic and ordinal) analyses were performed.

Setting: The study took place within the Dutch military.

Participants: Military personnel with MHI (n=324) and without MHI (n=554) were participated in this study.

Outcome Measure: (Non-)disclosure intentions and decisions.

Results: Common beliefs and attitudes were the preference to solve one's own problems (68.3%), the preference for privacy (58.9%) and a variety of stigma-related concerns. Common beliefs and attitudes were that personnel wanted to be their true authentic selves (93.3%) and the desire to act responsibly towards work colleagues (84.5%). The most reported need for future disclosure (96.8%) was having a supervisor who shows an understanding for MHI. The following factors were associated both with non-disclosure intentions and decisions: higher preference for privacy (OR (95% CI))=(1.99 (1.50 to 2.65), 2.05 (1.12 to 3.76)) and self-management (OR (95% CI))=(1.64 (1.20 to 2.23), 1.79 (1.00 to 3.20)), higher stigma-related concerns (OR (95% CI))=(1.76 (1.12 to 2.77), 2.21 (1.02 to 4.79)) and lower quality of supervisor-employee relationship (OR (95% CI))=(0.25 (0.15 to 0.42), 0.47 (0.25 to 0.87)).

Conclusion: To facilitate (early-)disclosure to a supervisor, creating opportunities for workplace support, interventions should focus on decreasing stigma and discrimination and align with personnels' preference for self-management. Furthermore, training is needed for supervisors on how to recognise, and effectively communicate with, personnel with MHI. Focus should also be on improving supervisor-employee relationships.

Citing Articles

The Job Demands and Accommodation Planning Tool (JDAPT): A Nine-Month Evaluation of Use, Changes in Self-efficacy, Presenteeism, and Absenteeism in Workers with Chronic and Episodic Disabilities.

Gignac M, Bowring J, Navaratnerajah L, Saunders R, Jetha A, Thompson A J Occup Rehabil. 2024; .

PMID: 39120861 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-024-10231-w.

References

Scior K, Rusch N, White C, Corrigan P . Supporting mental health disclosure decisions: the Honest, Open, Proud programme. Br J Psychiatry. 2019; 216(5):243-245. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2019.256. View

Dewa C, van Weeghel J, Joosen M, Gronholm P, Brouwers E . Workers' Decisions to Disclose a Mental Health Issue to Managers and the Consequences. Front Psychiatry. 2021; 12:631032. PMC: 8032877. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.631032. View

Brouwers E, Joosen M, van Zelst C, van Weeghel J . To Disclose or Not to Disclose: A Multi-stakeholder Focus Group Study on Mental Health Issues in the Work Environment. J Occup Rehabil. 2019; 30(1):84-92. PMC: 7031172. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-019-09848-z. View

Toth K, Yvon F, Villotti P, Lecomte T, Lachance J, Kirsh B . Disclosure dilemmas: how people with a mental health condition perceive and manage disclosure at work. Disabil Rehabil. 2021; 44(25):7791-7801. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1998667. View

Bertilsson M, Klinkhammer S, Staland-Nyman C, de Rijk A . How Managers Find Out About Common Mental Disorders Among Their Employees. J Occup Environ Med. 2021; 63(11):975-984. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002287. View

van der Wal S, Gorter R, Reijnen A, Geuze E, Vermetten E . Cohort profile: the Prospective Research In Stress-Related Military Operations (PRISMO) study in the Dutch Armed Forces. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(3):e026670. PMC: 6429862. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026670. View

Dewa C, van Weeghel J, Joosen M, Brouwers E . What Could Influence Workers' Decisions to Disclose a Mental Illness at Work?. Int J Occup Environ Med. 2020; 11(3):119-127. PMC: 7426736. DOI: 10.34172/ijoem.2020.1870. View

van Hees S, Carlier B, Vossen E, Blonk R, Oomens S . Towards a better understanding of work participation among employees with common mental health problems: a systematic realist review. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021; 48(3):173-189. PMC: 9523465. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4005. View

Rusch N, Kosters M . Honest, Open, Proud to support disclosure decisions and to decrease stigma's impact among people with mental illness: conceptual review and meta-analysis of program efficacy. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021; 56(9):1513-1526. PMC: 8429161. DOI: 10.1007/s00127-021-02076-y. View

10.

Brohan E, Henderson C, Wheat K, Malcolm E, Clement S, Barley E . Systematic review of beliefs, behaviours and influencing factors associated with disclosure of a mental health problem in the workplace. BMC Psychiatry. 2012; 12:11. PMC: 3298486. DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-11. View

11.

van Boekel L, Brouwers E, van Weeghel J, Garretsen H . Comparing stigmatising attitudes towards people with substance use disorders between the general public, GPs, mental health and addiction specialists and clients. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2014; 61(6):539-49. DOI: 10.1177/0020764014562051. View

12.

Bogaers R, Geuze E, van Weeghel J, Leijten F, Rusch N, van de Mheen D . Decision (not) to disclose mental health conditions or substance abuse in the work environment: a multiperspective focus group study within the military. BMJ Open. 2021; 11(10):e049370. PMC: 8559108. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049370. View

13.

Cook J, Copeland M, Floyd C, Jonikas J, Hamilton M, Razzano L . A randomized controlled trial of effects of Wellness Recovery Action Planning on depression, anxiety, and recovery. Psychiatr Serv. 2012; 63(6):541-7. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100125. View

14.

Gould M, Greenberg N, Hetherton J . Stigma and the military: evaluation of a PTSD psychoeducational program. J Trauma Stress. 2007; 20(4):505-15. DOI: 10.1002/jts.20233. View

15.

Holmes E, Corrigan P, Williams P, Canar J, Kubiak M . Changing attitudes about schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1999; 25(3):447-56. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033392. View

16.

von Elm E, Altman D, Egger M, Pocock S, Gotzsche P, Vandenbroucke J . The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Bull World Health Organ. 2007; 85(11):867-72. PMC: 2636253. DOI: 10.2471/blt.07.045120. View

17.

Ali R, Meena S, Eastwood B, Richards I, Marsden J . Ultra-rapid screening for substance-use disorders: the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST-Lite). Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013; 132(1-2):352-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.03.001. View

18.

Coleman S, Stevelink S, Hatch S, Denny J, Greenberg N . Stigma-related barriers and facilitators to help seeking for mental health issues in the armed forces: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative literature. Psychol Med. 2017; 47(11):1880-1892. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291717000356. View

19.

Stratton E, Einboden R, Ryan R, Choi I, Harvey S, Glozier N . Deciding to Disclose a Mental Health Condition in Male Dominated Workplaces; A Focus-Group Study. Front Psychiatry. 2019; 9:684. PMC: 6305748. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00684. View

20.

Kim P, Thomas J, Wilk J, Castro C, Hoge C . Stigma, barriers to care, and use of mental health services among active duty and National Guard soldiers after combat. Psychiatr Serv. 2010; 61(6):582-8. DOI: 10.1176/ps.2010.61.6.582. View