» Articles » PMID: 37039907

Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of One Shot Dilation Vs. Gradual Dilation Technique in Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Overview
Journal World J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2023 Apr 11
PMID 37039907
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of gradual dilation (GD) and one-shot dilation (OSD) techniques in patients who underwent supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

Methods: The data of 176 patients who underwent supine PCNL were reviewed. Eighty-seven patients who underwent OSD were defined as group 1, and 89 patients who underwent GD were defined as group 2. Both surgical techniques were compared with each other in terms of various parameters. Then, regression analysis of factors predicting stone-free status and complications in patients who underwent supine PNL were performed. Then, regression analysis of factors predicting success rate and complications in patients who underwent supine PNL were performed.

Results: No statistical difference was found in terms of stone-free rate, Clavien-Dindo complication grade and operation time. No statistical difference was found in terms of success rate, Clavien-Dindo complication grade and operation time. However, the fluoroscopy time was found to be significantly shorter in group 1 (p < 0.001). In the analysis of factors predicting stone-free status, the presence of calyceal stones, increased stone size and number were associated with a decrease in stone-free rate. In the analysis of factors predicting success, the presence of calyceal stones, increased stone size and number were associated with a decrease in success rate. Increased fluoroscopy and operation time, increased complication rates were found to be significantly associated with residual stone. Analysis of factors predicting complications found a higher complication rate in patients with low BMI and severe hydronephrosis. Increased complication was associated with increased time to nephrostomy removal and hospital stay, decrease in stone-free rate, decrease in Hb and increase in Cre value at the postoperative 24th hour.

Conclusion: When comparing OSD and GD in patients undergoing supine PCNL, both techniques have similar stone-free and complication rates. When comparing OSD and GD in patients undergoing supine PCNL, both techniques have similar success and complication rates. Compared to GD, the OSD technique can be preferred primarily due to its shorter fluoroscopy time.

Citing Articles

Effects of hydronephrosis on the surgical outcomes of fluoroscopically guided supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Yucel C, Ozbilen M, Bildirici C, Dumanli E, Akbay E, Yoldas M Int Urol Nephrol. 2024; 56(8):2555-2563.

PMID: 38431533 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-024-03969-y.

References
1.
FERNSTROM I, Johansson B . Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1976; 10(3):257-9. DOI: 10.1080/21681805.1976.11882084. View

2.
Ganpule A, Shah D, Desai M . Postpercutaneous nephrolithotomy bleeding: aetiology and management. Curr Opin Urol. 2014; 24(2):189-94. DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000025. View

3.
Yamaguchi A, Skolarikos A, Buchholz N, Bueno Chomon G, Grasso M, Saba P . Operating times and bleeding complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparison of tract dilation methods in 5,537 patients in the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study. J Endourol. 2011; 25(6):933-9. DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0606. View

4.
Tefekli A, Karadag M, Tepeler K, Sari E, Berberoglu Y, Baykal M . Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol. 2007; 53(1):184-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.06.049. View

5.
Valdivia J, Scarpa R, Duvdevani M, Gross A, Nadler R, Nutahara K . Supine versus prone position during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a report from the clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study. J Endourol. 2011; 25(10):1619-25. DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0110. View