» Articles » PMID: 37035658

Comparison of Cardiac Image-derived Input Functions for Quantitative Whole Body [F]FDG Imaging with Arterial Blood Sampling

Abstract

Dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) and the application of kinetic models can provide important quantitative information based on its temporal information. This however requires arterial blood sampling, which can be challenging to acquire. Nowadays, state-of-the-art PET/CT systems offer fully automated, whole-body (WB) kinetic modelling protocols using image-derived input functions (IDIF) to replace arterial blood sampling. Here, we compared the validity of an automatic WB kinetic model protocol to the reference standard arterial input function (AIF) for both clinical and research settings. Sixteen healthy participants underwent dynamic WB [F]FDG scans using a continuous bed motion PET/CT system with simultaneous arterial blood sampling. Multiple processing pipelines that included automatic and manually generated IDIFs derived from the aorta and left ventricle, with and without motion correction were compared to the AIF. Subsequently generated quantitative images of glucose metabolism were compared to evaluate performance of the different input functions. We observed moderate to high correlations between IDIFs and the AIF regarding area under the curve (r = 0.49-0.89) as well as for the cerebral metabolic rate of glucose (CMRGlu) (r = 0.68-0.95). Manual placing of IDIFs and motion correction further improved their similarity to the AIF. In general, the automatic vendor protocol is a feasible approach for the quantification of CMRGlu for both, clinical and research settings where expertise or time is not available. However, we advise on a rigorous inspection of the placement of the volume of interest, the resulting IDIF, and the quantitative values to ensure valid interpretations. In protocols requiring longer scan times or where cohorts are prone to involuntary movement, manual IDIF definition with additional motion correction is recommended, as this has greater accuracy and reliability.

Citing Articles

Validation of cardiac image-derived input functions for functional PET quantification.

Reed M, Handschuh P, Schmidt C, Murgas M, Gomola D, Milz C Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024; 51(9):2625-2637.

PMID: 38676734 PMC: 11224076. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06716-8.


Non-invasive assessment of stimulation-specific changes in cerebral glucose metabolism with functional PET.

Godbersen G, Falb P, Klug S, Silberbauer L, Reed M, Nics L Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024; 51(8):2283-2292.

PMID: 38491215 PMC: 11178598. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06675-0.


An update on the use of image-derived input functions for human PET studies: new hopes or old illusions?.

Volpi T, Maccioni L, Colpo M, Debiasi G, Capotosti A, Ciceri T EJNMMI Res. 2023; 13(1):97.

PMID: 37947880 PMC: 10638226. DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-01050-w.

References
1.
Feng D, Huang S, Wang X . Models for computer simulation studies of input functions for tracer kinetic modeling with positron emission tomography. Int J Biomed Comput. 1993; 32(2):95-110. DOI: 10.1016/0020-7101(93)90049-c. View

2.
Fletcher J, Djulbegovic B, Soares H, Siegel B, Lowe V, Lyman G . Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology. J Nucl Med. 2008; 49(3):480-508. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.107.047787. View

3.
Gryglewski G, Rischka L, Philippe C, Hahn A, James G, Klebermass E . Simple and rapid quantification of serotonin transporter binding using [C]DASB bolus plus constant infusion. Neuroimage. 2017; 149:23-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.050. View

4.
Osborne D, Acuff S . Whole-body dynamic imaging with continuous bed motion PET/CT. Nucl Med Commun. 2015; 37(4):428-31. PMC: 4764013. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000455. View

5.
Braune A, Hofheinz F, Bluth T, Kiss T, Wittenstein J, Scharffenberg M . Comparison of Static and Dynamic F-FDG PET/CT for Quantification of Pulmonary Inflammation in Acute Lung Injury. J Nucl Med. 2019; 60(11):1629-1634. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.226597. View