» Articles » PMID: 37035610

Quantifying the Opportunity Cost of Resident Involvement in Academic Orthopedic Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Matched - Pair Analysis

Overview
Journal Shoulder Elbow
Date 2023 Apr 10
PMID 37035610
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is minimal work defining the economic impact of resident participation in shoulder arthroplasty. Thus, this study quantified the opportunity cost of resident participation in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) by determining differences in operative time, relative value units (RVUs)/hour, and RVUs/case.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of shoulder arthroplasty procedures were identified from the ACS-NSQIP database from 2006 to 2014 using CPT codes. Demographic, comorbidity, preoperative laboratory data and surgical procedure were used to develop matched cohorts. Mean differences in operative time, RVUs/case and RVUs/hour between attending-only (AO) cases and cases with resident involvement (RI) were examined. Cost analysis was performed to identify differences in RVUs generated per hour in dollars/case.

Results: A total of 1786 AO and 1102 RI cases were identified. With the exception of PGY-3 and PGY-4 cases, RI cases had lower mean operative times compared to AO cases. The cost of RI was highest for PGY-3 ($199.87 per case) and PGY-4 ($9 .2 9) residents with all other postgraduate years providing a cost reduction.

Discussion: Involvement of residents was associated with shorter operative times leading to a savings of $29.64 per case. Involvement of intermediate-level (PGY-3) residents were associated with increased costs that ultimately decreased as residents became more senior.

References
1.
Buck J, Wally M, Patt J, Scannell B, Seymour R, Hsu J . Teaching Cortical-Screw Tightening: A Simple, Affordable, Torque-Directed Training Protocol Improves Resident Performance. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019; 101(11):e51. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01563. View

2.
Simwita Y, Helgheim B . Improving surgeon utilization in an orthopedic department using simulation modeling. J Healthc Leadersh. 2018; 8:41-50. PMC: 5741007. DOI: 10.2147/JHL.S112856. View

3.
Austin P . A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity score. Stat Med. 2013; 33(6):1057-69. PMC: 4285163. DOI: 10.1002/sim.6004. View

4.
Su A, Lee M . The Cost and Educational Experience of Treating Supracondylar Humerus Fractures: A Pilot Analysis on Standardizing Surgical Care. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2020; 4(6). PMC: 7322776. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00063. View

5.
Haughom B, Schairer W, Hellman M, Yi P, Levine B . Does resident involvement impact post-operative complications following primary total knee arthroplasty? An analysis of 24,529 cases. J Arthroplasty. 2014; 29(7):1468-1472.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.02.036. View