» Articles » PMID: 37034256

Recent Advancement in Finite Element Analysis of Spinal Interbody Cages: A Review

Overview
Date 2023 Apr 10
PMID 37034256
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Finite element analysis (FEA) is a widely used tool in a variety of industries and research endeavors. With its application to spine biomechanics, FEA has contributed to a better understanding of the spine, its components, and its behavior in physiological and pathological conditions, as well as assisting in the design and application of spinal instrumentation, particularly spinal interbody cages (ICs). IC is a highly effective instrumentation for achieving spinal fusion that has been used to treat a variety of spinal disorders, including degenerative disc disease, trauma, tumor reconstruction, and scoliosis. The application of FEA lets new designs be thoroughly "tested" before a cage is even manufactured, allowing bio-mechanical responses and spinal fusion processes that cannot easily be experimented upon to be examined and "diagnosis" to be performed, which is an important addition to clinical and experimental studies. This paper reviews the recent progress of FEA in spinal ICs over the last six years. It demonstrates how modeling can aid in evaluating the biomechanical response of cage materials, cage design, and fixation devices, understanding bone formation mechanisms, comparing the benefits of various fusion techniques, and investigating the impact of pathological structures. It also summarizes the various limitations brought about by modeling simplification and looks forward to the significant advancement of spine FEA research as computing efficiency and software capabilities increase. In conclusion, in such a fast-paced field, the FEA is critical for spinal IC studies. It helps in quantitatively and visually demonstrating the cage characteristics after implanting, lowering surgeons' learning costs for new cage products, and probably assisting them in determining the best IC for patients.

Citing Articles

The effects of cage on endplate collapse after stand-alone OLIF: based on finite element analysis and mechanics experiments.

Li H, Liu J, Cui H, Shen N, Wu F, Zhang Z Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1508385.

PMID: 39723127 PMC: 11669059. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1508385.


Biomechanical differences between two different shapes of oblique lumbar interbody fusion cages on whether to add posterior internal fixation system: a finite element analysis.

Liu J, Geng Z, Wang J, Zhang Z, Zhang X, Miao J J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18(1):962.

PMID: 38093357 PMC: 10720077. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04461-6.

References
1.
Wang H, Wan Y, Li Q, Xia Y, Liu X, Liu Z . Porous fusion cage design via integrated global-local topology optimization and biomechanical analysis of performance. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020; 112:103982. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103982. View

2.
Wang H, Wan Y, Liu X, Ren B, Xia Y, Liu Z . The biomechanical effects of Ti versus PEEK used in the PLIF surgery on lumbar spine: a finite element analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2021; 24(10):1115-1124. DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1869219. View

3.
Fan W, Guo L, Zhang M . Biomechanical analysis of lumbar interbody fusion supplemented with various posterior stabilization systems. Eur Spine J. 2021; 30(8):2342-2350. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06856-7. View

4.
Umale S, Yoganandan N, Baisden J, Choi H, Kurpad S . A biomechanical investigation of lumbar interbody fusion techniques. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021; 125:104961. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104961. View

5.
Viceconti M, Clapworthy G, Jan S . The Virtual Physiological Human - a European initiative for in silico human modelling -. J Physiol Sci. 2008; 58(7):441-6. DOI: 10.2170/physiolsci.RP009908. View