Experimental Analysis and Numerical Fatigue Life Prediction of 3D-Printed Osteosynthesis Plates

Overview

Journal Front Bioeng Biotechnol

Date 2023 Apr 10

PMID 37034247

Authors

Mohsen Nakhaei

Manon Sterba

Jean-Marc Foletti

Laurent Badih

Michel Behr

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The trend towards patient-specific medical orthopedic prostheses has led to an increased use of 3D-printed surgical implants made of Ti6Al4V. However, uncertainties arise due to varying printing parameters, particularly with regards to the fatigue limit. This necessitates time-consuming and costly experimental validation before they can be safely used on patients. To address this issue, this study aimed to employ a stress-life fatigue analysis approach coupled with a finite element (FE) simulation to estimate numerically the fatigue limit and location of failure for 3D-printed surgical osteosynthesis plates and to validate the results experimentally. However, predicting the fatigue life of 3D components is not a new concept and has previously been implemented in the medical device field, though without experimental validation. Then, an experimental fatigue test was conducted using a proposed modification to the staircase method introduced in ISO 12107. Additionally, a FE model was developed to estimate the stress cycles on the plate. The stress number of cycles to failure curve (S-N) obtained from the minimum mechanical properties of 3D-printed Ti6AI4V alloy according to ASTM F3001-14 to predict the fatigue limit. The comparison between experimental results and fatigue numerical predictions showed very good agreement. It was found that a linear elastic FE model was sufficient to estimate the fatigue limit, while an elastic-plastic model led to an accurate prediction throughout the implant's cyclic life. The proposed method has great potential for enhancing patient-specific implant designs without the need for time-consuming and costly experimental regulatory testing.

Citing Articles

Bone Plates Runout Prediction Through Tensile Strength and Geometric Properties for Regulatory Mechanical Testing.

Bologna F, Audenino A, Terzini M Ann Biomed Eng. 2023; 52(2):239-249.

PMID: 37726437 PMC: 10810033. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-023-03363-2.

References

Cordey J, Borgeaud M, Perren S . Force transfer between the plate and the bone: relative importance of the bending stiffness of the screws friction between plate and bone. Injury. 2000; 31 Suppl 3:C21-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(00)80028-5. View

Buschang P, Hayasaki H, Throckmorton G . Quantification of human chewing-cycle kinematics. Arch Oral Biol. 2000; 45(6):461-74. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9969(00)00015-7. View

Peck C . Biomechanics of occlusion--implications for oral rehabilitation. J Oral Rehabil. 2015; 43(3):205-14. DOI: 10.1111/joor.12345. View

He J, Li D, Jiang W, Ke L, Qin G, Ye Y . The Martensitic Transformation and Mechanical Properties of Ti6Al4V Prepared via Selective Laser Melting. Materials (Basel). 2019; 12(2). PMC: 6356939. DOI: 10.3390/ma12020321. View

Ellis E, Throckmorton G . Treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures: biological considerations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 63(1):115-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.02.019. View

Shimada A, Yamabe Y, Torisu T, Baad-Hansen L, Murata H, Svensson P . Measurement of dynamic bite force during mastication. J Oral Rehabil. 2012; 39(5):349-56. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02278.x. View

Almansoori A, Choung H, Kim B, Park J, Kim S, Lee J . Fracture of Standard Titanium Mandibular Reconstruction Plates and Preliminary Study of Three-Dimensional Printed Reconstruction Plates. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 78(1):153-166. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.07.016. View

Gerlach K, Schwarz A . Bite forces in patients after treatment of mandibular angle fractures with miniplate osteosynthesis according to Champy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002; 31(4):345-8. DOI: 10.1054/ijom.2002.0290. View

Ueki K, Marukawa K, Moroi A, Sotobori M, Ishihara Y, Iguchi R . Evaluation of overlapped cortical bone area after modified plate fixation with bent plate in sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013; 42(5):e210-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.08.009. View

10.

Jehn P, Spalthoff S, Korn P, Zeller A, Dittmann J, Zimmerer R . Patient-specific implant modification for alloplastic bridging of mandibular segmental defects in head and neck surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020; 48(3):315-322. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2020.01.018. View

11.

Raja Izaham R, Rafiq Abdul Kadir M, Abdul Rashid A, Hossain M, Kamarul T . Finite element analysis of Puddu and Tomofix plate fixation for open wedge high tibial osteotomy. Injury. 2011; 43(6):898-902. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.12.006. View

12.

Wintergerst A, Buschang P, Hutchins B, Throckmorton G . Effect of an auditory cue on chewing cycle kinematics. Arch Oral Biol. 2005; 51(1):50-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2005.05.003. View

13.

Throckmorton G, Buschang P, Ellis 3rd E . Improvement of maximum occlusal forces after orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996; 54(9):1080-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(96)90165-2. View

14.

Reitzik M, Schoorl W . Bone repair in the mandible: a histologic and biometric comparison between rigid and semirigid fixation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1983; 41(4):215-8. DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(83)90263-x. View

15.

Parr W, Wang T, Tan C, Dan M, Walsh W, Morberg P . Fatigue implications for bending orthopaedic plates. Injury. 2021; 52(10):2896-2902. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.01.022. View

16.

Tate G, Ellis 3rd E, Throckmorton G . Bite forces in patients treated for mandibular angle fractures: implications for fixation recommendations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994; 52(7):734-6. DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(94)90489-8. View

17.

Bordin D, Bergamo E, Fardin V, Coelho P, Bonfante E . Fracture strength and probability of survival of narrow and extra-narrow dental implants after fatigue testing: In vitro and in silico analysis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017; 71:244-249. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.03.022. View

18.

Harada K, Watanabe M, Ohkura K, Enomoto S . Measure of bite force and occlusal contact area before and after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible using a new pressure-sensitive device: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000; 58(4):370-3; discussion 373-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(00)90913-3. View