» Articles » PMID: 37032522

Coracoid Process Fractures of the Scapula Treated by Baseplate Three-Column Glenoid Fixation: A Retrospective Study of 24 Patients

Overview
Journal Med Sci Monit
Date 2023 Apr 10
PMID 37032522
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

BACKGROUND This retrospective study from a single center aimed to evaluate 24 patients with coracoid process fractures of the scapula treated by baseplate three-column glenoid fixation of the 3 columns attached to the glenoid, or the scapula-glenoid construct, which includes the base of the coracoid, the scapular spine, and the lateral/scapular pillar. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty-four patients with 24 coracoid process fractures were treated from March 2018 to August 2020 in our hospital; 11 cases were treated with the modified technique and 13 with the conventional technique. The patients had comparable screw length, bone union time, fracture reduction, and Constant-Murley shoulder outcome scores. The significant differences between variables were tested using the t test and Fisher's exact test, while bone union and reduction position were confirmed with X-ray and CT scans. The average follow-up time was 12 months. RESULTS The mean Constant-Murley shoulder outcome score and fracture reduction did not differ significantly (P>0.05), and all patients returned to their previous occupations and levels of activity, with no loss of reduction or surgical revision at the last follow-up. Bone union time for the modified group was longer than that of the conventional group (P<0.05). However, 1 patient had a screw broken at 5 months from heavy manual labor and showed delayed union at 8 months. The lengths of the coracoid process screws in the modified group were longer than in the conventional group (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS The findings from this retrospective study showed that baseplate three-column glenoid fixation of the coracoid process was a good surgical option for coracoid process fractures.

Citing Articles

Ipsilateral concomitant fractures of the clavicle and coracoid process of the scapula: incidence, characteristics, and outcomes.

Zhang N, Bai G, Kang X, Zhu Y, Feng D J Orthop Traumatol. 2025; 26(1):2.

PMID: 39825975 PMC: 11741964. DOI: 10.1186/s10195-025-00817-2.

References
1.
Mohammed H, Skalski M, Patel D, Tomasian A, Schein A, White E . Coracoid Process: The Lighthouse of the Shoulder. Radiographics. 2016; 36(7):2084-2101. DOI: 10.1148/rg.2016160039. View

2.
Hak D, Johnson E . Avulsion fracture of the coracoid associated with acromioclavicular dislocation. J Orthop Trauma. 1993; 7(4):381-3. View

3.
Hill B, Jacobson A, Anavian J, Cole P . Surgical management of coracoid fractures: technical tricks and clinical experience. J Orthop Trauma. 2014; 28(5):e114-22. DOI: 10.1097/01.bot.0000435632.71393.bb. View

4.
Anavian J, Wijdicks C, Schroder L, Vang S, Cole P . Surgery for scapula process fractures: good outcome in 26 patients. Acta Orthop. 2009; 80(3):344-50. PMC: 2823212. DOI: 10.3109/17453670903025394. View

5.
Frankle M, Teramoto A, Luo Z, Levy J, Pupello D . Glenoid morphology in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: classification and surgical implications. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009; 18(6):874-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.02.013. View