» Articles » PMID: 37025889

Tectonic Infarct Analysis: A Computational Tool for Automated Whole-brain Infarct Analysis from TTC-stained Tissue

Abstract

Background: Infarct volume measured from 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC)-stained brain slices is critical to stroke models. In this study, we developed an interactive, tunable, software that automatically computes whole-brain infarct metrics from serial TTC-stained brain sections.

Methods: Three rat ischemic stroke cohorts were used in this study (Total  = 91 rats; Cohort 1  = 21, Cohort 2  = 40, Cohort 3  = 30). For each, brains were serially-sliced, stained with TTC and scanned on both anterior and posterior sides. Ground truth annotation and infarct morphometric analysis (e.g., brain-V, infarct-V, and non-infarct-V volumes) were completed by domain experts. We used Cohort 1 for brain and infarct segmentation model development ( = 3 training cases with 36 slices [18 anterior and posterior faces],  = 18 testing cases with 218 slices [109 anterior and posterior faces]), as well as infarct morphometrics automation. The infarct quantification pipeline and pre-trained model were packaged as a standalone software and applied to Cohort 2, an internal validation dataset. Finally, software and model trainability were tested as a use-case with Cohort 3, a dataset from a separate institute.

Results: Both high segmentation and statistically significant quantification performance (correlation between manual and software) were observed across all datasets. Segmentation performance: Cohort 1 brain accuracy = 0.95/f1-score = 0.90, infarct accuracy = 0.96/f1-score = 0.89; Cohort 2 brain accuracy = 0.97/f1-score = 0.90, infarct accuracy = 0.97/f1-score = 0.80; Cohort 3 brain accuracy = 0.96/f1-score = 0.92, infarct accuracy = 0.95/f1-score = 0.82. Infarct quantification (cohort average): V (ρ = 0.87,  < 0.001), V (0.92,  < 0.001), V (0.80,  < 0.001), %infarct (0.87,  = 0.001), and infarct:non-infact ratio (ρ = 0.92,  < 0.001).

Conclusion: Tectonic Infarct Analysis software offers a robust and adaptable approach for rapid TTC-based stroke assessment.

Citing Articles

Deep learning segmentation model for quantification of infarct size in pigs with myocardial ischemia/reperfusion.

Braczko F, Skyschally A, Lieder H, Kather J, Kleinbongard P, Heusch G Basic Res Cardiol. 2024; 119(6):923-936.

PMID: 39348000 PMC: 11628591. DOI: 10.1007/s00395-024-01081-x.

References
1.
Grotta J . tPA for stroke: important progress in achieving faster treatment. JAMA. 2014; 311(16):1615-7. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.3322. View

2.
Gong L, Zheng X, Feng L, Zhang X, Dong Q, Zhou X . Bridging Therapy Versus Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke due to Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion: A Clinical- Histological Analysis of Retrieved Thrombi. Cell Transplant. 2019; 28(6):684-690. PMC: 6686432. DOI: 10.1177/0963689718823206. View

3.
Swanson R, Morton M, Savalos R, Davidson C, Sharp F . A semiautomated method for measuring brain infarct volume. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1990; 10(2):290-3. DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.1990.47. View

4.
Henninger N, Sicard K, Schmidt K, Bardutzky J, Fisher M . Comparison of ischemic lesion evolution in embolic versus mechanical middle cerebral artery occlusion in Sprague Dawley rats using diffusion and perfusion imaging. Stroke. 2006; 37(5):1283-7. DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000217223.72193.98. View

5.
Kuriakose D, Xiao Z . Pathophysiology and Treatment of Stroke: Present Status and Future Perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(20). PMC: 7589849. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21207609. View