» Articles » PMID: 37025410

MRI-based Porosity Index (PI) and Suppression Ratio (SR) in the Tibial Cortex Show Significant Differences Between Normal, Osteopenic, and Osteoporotic Female Subjects

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2023 Apr 7
PMID 37025410
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI enables quantitative assessment of cortical bone. The signal ratio in dual-echo UTE imaging, known as porosity index (PI), as well as the signal ratio between UTE and inversion recovery UTE (IR-UTE) imaging, known as the suppression ratio (SR), are two rapid UTE-based bone evaluation techniques developed to reduce the time demand and cost in future clinical studies. The goal of this study was to investigate the performance of PI and SR in detecting bone quality differences between subjects with osteoporosis (OPo), osteopenia (OPe), and normal bone (Normal).

Methods: Tibial midshaft of fourteen OPe (72 ± 6 years old), thirty-one OPo (72 ± 6 years old), and thirty-seven Normal (36 ± 19 years old) subjects were scanned using dual-echo UTE and IR-UTE sequences on a clinical 3T scanner. Measured PI, SR, and bone thickness were compared between OPo, OPe, and normal bone (Normal) subjects using the Kruskal-Wallis test by ranks. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were calculated between dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) T-score and UTE-MRI results.

Results: PI was significantly higher in the OPo group compared with the Normal (24.1%) and OPe (16.3%) groups. SR was significantly higher in the OPo group compared with the Normal (41.5%) and OPe (21.8%) groups. SR differences between the OPe and Normal groups were also statistically significant (16.2%). Cortical bone was significantly thinner in the OPo group compared with the Normal (22.0%) and OPe (13.0%) groups. DEXA T-scores in subjects were significantly correlated with PI (R=-0.32), SR (R=-0.50), and bone thickness (R=0.51).

Discussion: PI and SR, as rapid UTE-MRI-based techniques, may be useful tools to detect and monitor bone quality changes, in addition to bone morphology, in individuals affected by osteoporosis.

Citing Articles

Estimation of Trabecular Bone Volume with Dual-Echo Ultrashort Echo Time (UTE) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Significantly Correlates with High-Resolution Computed Tomography (CT).

Cheng K, Moazamian D, Namiranian B, Shaterian Mohammadi H, Alenezi S, Chung C J Imaging. 2025; 11(2).

PMID: 39997559 PMC: 11856473. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging11020057.


Ultrashort echo time MRI detects significantly lower collagen but higher pore water in the tibial cortex of female patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis.

Jerban S, Ma Y, Wei Z, Shen M, Ibrahim Z, Jang H J Bone Miner Res. 2024; 39(6):707-716.

PMID: 38591788 PMC: 11523241. DOI: 10.1093/jbmr/zjae053.


Bone Biomarkers Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Jerban S, Jang H, Chang E, Bukata S, Du J, Chung C Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2024; 28(1):62-77.

PMID: 38330971 PMC: 11786623. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1776431.


A comprehensive set of ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers to assess cortical bone health: A feasibility study at clinical field strength.

Jacobson A, Zhao X, Sommer S, Sadik F, Warden S, Newman C Bone. 2024; 181:117031.

PMID: 38311304 PMC: 10923147. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2024.117031.


In Vivo Assessment of Bone Quality Without X-rays.

Surowiec R, Does M, Nyman J Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2024; 22(1):56-68.

PMID: 38227178 PMC: 11050740. DOI: 10.1007/s11914-023-00856-w.

References
1.
Harkins K, Ketsiri T, Nyman J, Does M . Fast bound and pore water mapping of cortical bone with arbitrary slice oriented two-dimensional ultra-short echo time. Magn Reson Med. 2022; 89(2):767-773. PMC: 9897494. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29484. View

2.
Jerban S, Ma Y, Afsahi A, Lombardi A, Wei Z, Shen M . Lower Macromolecular Content in Tendons of Female Patients with Osteoporosis versus Patients with Osteopenia Detected by Ultrashort Echo Time (UTE) MRI. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(5). PMC: 9140093. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051061. View

3.
Jerban S, Ma Y, Wei Z, Jang H, Chang E, Du J . Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cortical and Trabecular Bone. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2020; 24(4):386-401. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1710355. View

4.
Athertya J, Ma Y, Afsahi A, Lombardi A, Moazamian D, Jerban S . Accelerated Quantitative 3D UTE-Cones Imaging Using Compressed Sensing. Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(19). PMC: 9573555. DOI: 10.3390/s22197459. View

5.
Chang G, Deniz C, Honig S, Rajapakse C, Egol K, Regatte R . Feasibility of three-dimensional MRI of proximal femur microarchitecture at 3 tesla using 26 receive elements without and with parallel imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014; 40(1):229-38. PMC: 4004721. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24345. View