» Articles » PMID: 37025314

Assessment of Ratio of Height to Rhinion-Mentum Distance As a Predictive Tool for Difficult Tracheal Intubation

Overview
Journal Tanaffos
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2023 Apr 7
PMID 37025314
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Difficult Intubation (DI) is a constant concern for anesthesiologists and being able to predict it will improve patient safety. Different tests have been presented in anesthesiology practice to increase the accuracy of the DI prediction. Since there is no single sensitive and specific test, most of the practitioners use a combination of them. Here we report a new and novel index of ratio of height to rhinion-mentum distance (RHRMD) to improve the prediction.

Materials And Methods: Four hundred adult patients' candidate for elective surgery were enrolled into the study. Initially, patients' data such as weight, height and rhinion-mentum distance (RMD) were recorded by the first anesthesiologist. After anesthesia induction, the second anesthesiologist performed laryngoscopy and recorded the Cormack-Lehane (CL) score. CL score III or higher was considered as DI. Finally, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for RHRMD was calculated.

Results: DI was reported in 7.75% of patients. RHRMD is related with CL grade: as the former increased, the latter decreased. RHRMD with cut-off point 25.4 has 90.6% sensitivity, 29.9% specificity, 10.1% PPV and 97.3% NPV in predicting DI.

Conclusion: RHRMD with 90.6% sensitivity and 97.3% NPV could be a valuable tool for prediction of DI.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Acromio-Axillo-Suprasternal Notch Index (AASI) with Hyomental Distance Ratio Test (HMDR) in Predicting Difficult Visualization of the Larynx.

Jaffari A, Aghamohammadi H, Hamedi M, Kamranmanesh M, Sezari P, Mottaghi K Tanaffos. 2025; 23(2):163-169.

PMID: 39959803 PMC: 11825070.

References
1.
Roth D, Pace N, Lee A, Hovhannisyan K, Warenits A, Arrich J . Airway physical examination tests for detection of difficult airway management in apparently normal adult patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 5:CD008874. PMC: 6404686. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008874.pub2. View

2.
Ji C, Ni Q, Chen W . Diagnostic accuracy of radiology (CT, X-ray, US) for predicting difficult intubation in adults: A meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2018; 45:79-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.12.023. View

3.
Torres K, Blonski M, Pietrzyk L, Piasecka-Twarog M, Maciejewski R, Torres A . Usefulness and diagnostic value of the NEMA parameter combined with other selected bedside tests for prediction of difficult intubation. J Clin Anesth. 2017; 37:132-135. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.11.009. View

4.
De Jong A, Molinari N, Pouzeratte Y, Verzilli D, Chanques G, Jung B . Difficult intubation in obese patients: incidence, risk factors, and complications in the operating theatre and in intensive care units. Br J Anaesth. 2014; 114(2):297-306. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeu373. View

5.
Badheka J, Doshi P, Vyas A, Kacha N, Parmar V . Comparison of upper lip bite test and ratio of height to thyromental distance with other airway assessment tests for predicting difficult endotracheal intubation. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2016; 20(1):3-8. PMC: 4759991. DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.173678. View