» Articles » PMID: 37024748

A Comparison Between Centrally and Systemically Administered Erythropoietin on Kidney Protection in a Model of Fixed-volume Hemorrhagic Shock in Male Rats

Overview
Journal Mol Biol Rep
Specialty Molecular Biology
Date 2023 Apr 6
PMID 37024748
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In this study, a comparison between centrally and systemically administered erythropoietin (EPO) was performed on nephroprotection during hemorrhagic shock (HS) in male rats.

Methods: Male rats were allocated into four experimental groups. (1) Sham; a guide cannula was inserted into the left lateral ventricle and other cannulas were placed into the left femoral artery and vein. (2) HS; stereotaxic surgery was done to insert a cannula in the left lateral ventricle and after a 7-day recovery; hemorrhagic shock and resuscitation were performed. (3) EPO-systemic; the procedure was the same as the HS group except that animals received 300 IU/kg erythropoietin into the femoral vein immediately before resuscitation. (4) EPO-central; animals was treated with erythropoietin (2 IU/rat) into the left lateral ventricle before resuscitation. Arterial oxygen saturation (SaO) was measured during experiments. Urine and renal tissue samples were stored for ex-vivo indices assessments.

Results: Erythropoietin (systemically/centrally administered) significantly improved SaO renal functional and oxidative stress parameters and decreased renal inflammatory (TNF-α and IL-6) mRNA expression compared to the HS group. EPO-treated groups showed a decrease in active form of caspase-3 protein level and an increase in autophagy activity in comparison with the HS group.

Conclusion: Considering the fact that the effective dose of systemic EPO (300 IU/kg) was roughly 50 times higher than that of central administration (2 IU/rat), centrally administered EPO was accompanied by more advantageous consequences than systemic way. EPO is likely to act as a neuro-modulator or neuro-mediator in the central protection of organs including the kidneys.

References
1.
Kholmukhamedov A, Czerny C, Hu J, Schwartz J, Zhong Z, Lemasters J . Minocycline and doxycycline, but not tetracycline, mitigate liver and kidney injury after hemorrhagic shock/resuscitation. Shock. 2014; 42(3):256-63. PMC: 4134396. DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000213. View

2.
Ranjbaran M, Kadkhodaee M, Seifi B, Adelipour M, Azarian B . Erythropoietin attenuates experimental haemorrhagic shock-induced renal damage through an iNOS- dependent mechanism in male Wistar rats. Injury. 2017; 48(2):262-269. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.01.010. View

3.
Wang Y, Yan J, Xi L, Qian Z, Wang Z, Yang L . Protective effect of crocetin on hemorrhagic shock-induced acute renal failure in rats. Shock. 2012; 38(1):63-7. DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3182596ec4. View

4.
Gilbert K, Rousseau G, Bouchard C, Dunberry-Poissant S, Baril F, Cardinal A . Caspase-(8/3) activation and organ inflammation in a rat model of resuscitated hemorrhagic shock: A role for uric acid. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018; 86(3):431-439. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002152. View

5.
Wang L, Di L, Noguchi C . Erythropoietin, a novel versatile player regulating energy metabolism beyond the erythroid system. Int J Biol Sci. 2014; 10(8):921-39. PMC: 4147225. DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.9518. View