» Articles » PMID: 37024644

Comparison of Toe Pressure Strength in the Standing Position and Toe Grip Strength in Association with the Presence of Assistance in Standing Up: a Cross-sectional Study in Community-dwelling Older Adults

Overview
Journal Eur Geriatr Med
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2023 Apr 6
PMID 37024644
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We believe that toe pressure strength in the standing position, which is closer to the actual movement, is more associated with standing up in the older adults than the conventional toe grip strength. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine the association between toe pressure strength in the standing position and the presence of assistance in standing up in the older adults.

Methods: Ninety-five community-dwelling older adults (82 ± 8 years old, 72% female) were included in this study. The patients were evaluated based on their need for assistance in standing up. Physical functions, including toe pressure strength in the standing position, toe grip strength, hand grip strength, knee extension strength, one-leg standing time with eyes open, and maximal walking speed, were measured.

Results: When compared with and without assistance to stand up, the group requiring assistance had weaker toe pressure strength in the standing position than the group without assistance (p = 0.015, ES = 0.53). After adjusting for confounding factors, the final model revealed that toe pressure strength in the standing position was associated with the use of assistance in standing up (odds ratio 0.94 [0.88-0.99, p = 0.025]).

Conclusion: Toe pressure strength in the standing position was associated with the use of assistance in standing up in older adults. Improving toe pressure strength in the standing position may facilitate the ability of older adults to stand up.

Citing Articles

Age-specific comparisons in the rate of force development of toe pressure strength and its association with the timed up and go test.

Kamasaki T, Otao H, Tanaka S, Hachiya M, Kubo A, Okawa H Eur Geriatr Med. 2024; 15(3):689-698.

PMID: 38441837 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-024-00959-2.


Do visual and step height factors cause imbalance during bipedal and unipedal stances? A plantar pressure perspective.

Guo P, Wang D, Li Y, Wang R, Xu H, Han J Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1253056.

PMID: 37662431 PMC: 10470124. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1253056.

References
1.
van der Kruk E, Strutton P, Koizia L, Fertleman M, Reilly P, Bull A . Why do older adults stand-up differently to young adults?: investigation of compensatory movement strategies in sit-to-walk. NPJ Aging. 2022; 8(1):13. PMC: 9445096. DOI: 10.1038/s41514-022-00094-x. View

2.
Ardali G, States R, Brody L, Godwin E . The Relationship Between Performance of Sit-To-Stand From a Chair and Getting Down and Up From the Floor in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. Physiother Theory Pract. 2020; 38(6):818-829. DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2020.1802796. View

3.
Gianoudis J, Bailey C, Daly R . Associations between sedentary behaviour and body composition, muscle function and sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults. Osteoporos Int. 2014; 26(2):571-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-014-2895-y. View

4.
Pulsford R, Stamatakis E, Britton A, Brunner E, Hillsdon M . Associations of sitting behaviours with all-cause mortality over a 16-year follow-up: the Whitehall II study. Int J Epidemiol. 2015; 44(6):1909-16. PMC: 4690002. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyv191. View

5.
Leung C, Yeh P . Vertical force and wrist deviation angle when using a walker to stand up and sit down. Percept Mot Skills. 2011; 113(1):229-41. DOI: 10.2466/10.15.26.PMS.113.4.229-241. View