» Articles » PMID: 37024129

Benefits and Harms of Drug Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Abstract

Objective: To compare the benefits and harms of drug treatments for adults with type 2 diabetes, adding non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (including finerenone) and tirzepatide (a dual glucose dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)/glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist) to previously existing treatment options.

Design: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Data Sources: Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central up to 14 October 2022.

Eligibility Criteria For Selecting Studies: Eligible randomised controlled trials compared drugs of interest in adults with type 2 diabetes. Eligible trials had a follow-up of 24 weeks or longer. Trials systematically comparing combinations of more than one drug treatment class with no drug, subgroup analyses of randomised controlled trials, and non-English language studies were deemed ineligible. Certainty of evidence was assessed following the GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation) approach.

Results: The analysis identified 816 trials with 471 038 patients, together evaluating 13 different drug classes; all subsequent estimates refer to the comparison with standard treatments. Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors (odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.83 to 0.94; high certainty) and GLP-1 receptor agonists (0.88, 0.82 to 0.93; high certainty) reduce all cause death; non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, so far tested only with finerenone in patients with chronic kidney disease, probably reduce mortality (0.89, 0.79 to 1.00; moderate certainty); other drugs may not. The study confirmed the benefits of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists in reducing cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, admission to hospital for heart failure, and end stage kidney disease. Finerenone probably reduces admissions to hospital for heart failure and end stage kidney disease, and possibly cardiovascular death. Only GLP-1 receptor agonists reduce non-fatal stroke; SGLT-2 inhibitors are superior to other drugs in reducing end stage kidney disease. GLP-1 receptor agonists and probably SGLT-2 inhibitors and tirzepatide improve quality of life. Reported harms were largely specific to drug class (eg, genital infections with SGLT-2 inhibitors, severe gastrointestinal adverse events with tirzepatide and GLP-1 receptor agonists, hyperkalaemia leading to admission to hospital with finerenone). Tirzepatide probably results in the largest reduction in body weight (mean difference -8.57 kg; moderate certainty). Basal insulin (mean difference 2.15 kg; moderate certainty) and thiazolidinediones (mean difference 2.81 kg; moderate certainty) probably result in the largest increases in body weight. Absolute benefits of SGLT-2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and finerenone vary in people with type 2 diabetes, depending on baseline risks for cardiovascular and kidney outcomes (https://matchit.magicevidence.org/230125dist-diabetes).

Conclusions: This network meta-analysis extends knowledge beyond confirming the substantial benefits with the use of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists in reducing adverse cardiovascular and kidney outcomes and death by adding information on finerenone and tirzepatide. These findings highlight the need for continuous assessment of scientific progress to introduce cutting edge updates in clinical practice guidelines for people with type 2 diabetes.

Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42022325948.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and safety of 11 sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors at different dosages in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients inadequately controlled with metformin: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Xu L, Wu Y, Li J, Ding Y, Chow J, Li L BMJ Open. 2025; 15(2):e088687.

PMID: 40010842 PMC: 11877256. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088687.


A Hypothesis That Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Exert Immediate and Multifaceted Effects by Activating Adenosine Monophosphate-Activate Protein Kinase (AMPK).

Schooling C, Yang G, Soliman G, Leung G Life (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40003662 PMC: 11857512. DOI: 10.3390/life15020253.


Age and Sex Differences in Efficacy of Treatments for Type 2 Diabetes: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Hanlon P, Butterly E, Wei L, Wightman H, Almazam S, Alsallumi K JAMA. 2025; .

PMID: 39899304 PMC: 11791772. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.27402.


Understanding the disease: euglycemic ketoacidosis with SGLT2 inhibitors.

Malherbe J, Du Cheyron D, Valette X Intensive Care Med. 2025; .

PMID: 39899035 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-025-07806-3.


Naturopathic Management to Taper Off Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes: A Case Report.

Linder L Integr Med (Encinitas). 2025; 24(1):26-30.

PMID: 39896831 PMC: 11778319.


References
1.
Sato N, Ajioka M, Yamada T, Kato M, Myoishi M, Yamada T . A Randomized Controlled Study of Finerenone vs. Eplerenone in Japanese Patients With Worsening Chronic Heart Failure and Diabetes and/or Chronic Kidney Disease. Circ J. 2016; 80(5):1113-22. DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-0122. View

2.
Ryden L, Standl E . After Metformin - Next Steps for Type 2 Diabetes with Low Cardiovascular Risk. N Engl J Med. 2022; 387(12):1136-1138. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMe2210531. View

3.
Bhaumik D, Amatya A, Normand S, Greenhouse J, Kaizar E, Neelon B . Meta-Analysis of Rare Binary Adverse Event Data. J Am Stat Assoc. 2013; 107(498):555-567. PMC: 3665366. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2012.664484. View

4.
Konig J, Krahn U, Binder H . Visualizing the flow of evidence in network meta-analysis and characterizing mixed treatment comparisons. Stat Med. 2013; 32(30):5414-29. DOI: 10.1002/sim.6001. View

5.
Rosenstock J, Wysham C, Frias J, Kaneko S, Lee C, Lando L . Efficacy and safety of a novel dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide in patients with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS-1): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021; 398(10295):143-155. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01324-6. View