» Articles » PMID: 37020986

Reverse Expansion for Breast Reconstruction After Skin-sparing and Nipple-sparing Mastectomy: Our First 100 Cases

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2023 Apr 6
PMID 37020986
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Methods: From January 2010 to September 2018, 253 breast reconstruction procedures were performed on 100 patients. The reverse expansion technique consists of autologous fat tissue transplantation requiring the combined use of a skin expander and of multiple lipofilling sessions. At the beginning of every session the breast expander was deflated by removing a saline volume similar to that of the fat to be injected.

Results: Overall, 56 breast reconstructions after skin-sparing mastectomy and 44 after nipple-sparing mastectomy were performed. An average of 661.5 cm of fat per session was harvested and an average of 305.3 cm per breast was injected. The average number of sessions to achieve breast reconstruction was 2.53. Only four complications after 253 procedures (1.5%) were reported: one donor site hemorrhage due to genetic lack of coagulation factors, and three surgical site infections.

Conclusions: Considering the large number of positive factors such as a fast postoperative recovery, an easy learning curve, a lack of need of a specialized surgical team, a natural look of the breast shape, and the soft consistency of the grafted tissue, we believe this technique could be the first choice for autologous reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy and nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Citing Articles

MRI-Conditional Breast Tissue Expander: First In-Human Multi-Case Assessment of MRI-Related Complications and Image Quality.

Schiaffino S, Cozzi A, Pompei B, Scarano A, Catanese C, Catic A J Clin Med. 2023; 12(13).

PMID: 37445444 PMC: 10342840. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134410.

References
1.
Moyer H, Ghazi B, Daniel J, Gasgarth R, Carlson G . Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technical aspects and aesthetic outcomes. Ann Plast Surg. 2012; 68(5):446-50. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182394bba. View

2.
Cohen O, Lam G, Karp N, Choi M . Determining the Oncologic Safety of Autologous Fat Grafting as a Reconstructive Modality: An Institutional Review of Breast Cancer Recurrence Rates and Surgical Outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 140(3):382e-392e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003576. View

3.
Fabiocchi L, Semprini G, Cattin F, Dellachiesa L, Fogacci T, Frisoni G . 'Reverse expansion': A new technique of breast reconstruction with autologous tissue. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017; 70(11):1537-1542. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.07.001. View

4.
Kosowski T, Rigotti G, Khouri R . Tissue-Engineered Autologous Breast Regeneration with Brava®-Assisted Fat Grafting. Clin Plast Surg. 2015; 42(3):325-37, viii. DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2015.03.001. View

5.
Krastev T, van Turnhout A, Vriens E, Smits L, van der Hulst R . Long-term Follow-up of Autologous Fat Transfer vs Conventional Breast Reconstruction and Association With Cancer Relapse in Patients With Breast Cancer. JAMA Surg. 2018; 154(1):56-63. PMC: 6439860. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3744. View