» Articles » PMID: 37019028

Evaluation of the National Governmental Efforts Between 1997 and 2010 in Reducing Health Inequalities in England

Overview
Journal Public Health
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Public Health
Date 2023 Apr 5
PMID 37019028
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The pandemic has compounded existing inequalities. In the UK, there have been calls for a new cross-government health inequalities strategy. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of national governmental efforts between 1997 and 2010, referred to as the National Health Inequalities Strategy (NHIS).

Study Design: population-based observational study.

Methods: Using Global Burden of Disease data, age-standardised years of life lost due to premature mortality (YLL) rates per 10,000 were extracted for 150 Upper Tier Local Authority (UTLA) regions in England for every year between 1990 and 2019. The slope index of inequality was calculated using YLL rates for all causes, individual conditions, and risk factors. Joinpoint regression was used to assess the trends of any changes which arose before, during or after the NHIS.

Results: Absolute inequalities in YLL rates for all causes remained stable between 1990 and 2000, before decreasing over the following 10 years. After 2010, improvements slowed. A similar trend can be observed amongst inequalities in YLLs for individual causes, including ischaemic heart disease, stroke, breast cancer and lung cancer amongst females, and ischaemic heart disease stroke, diabetes and self-harm amongst males. This trend was also observed amongst certain risk factors, notably blood pressure, cholesterol, tobacco and dietary risks. Inequalities were generally greater in males than in females; however, trends were similar across both sexes. The NHIS coincided with significant reductions in inequalities in YLLs due to ischaemic heart disease and lung cancer.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that the NHIS coincided with a reduction in health inequalities in England. Policy makers should consider a new cross-government strategy to tackle health inequalities drawing from the success of the previous NHIS.

Citing Articles

The impact of primary care funding on health inequalities: an umbrella review.

Holdroyd I, McCann L, Berger M, Fisher R, Ford J Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2025; 26:e24.

PMID: 40017117 PMC: 11883797. DOI: 10.1017/S146342362500012X.


Changing life expectancy in European countries 1990-2021: a subanalysis of causes and risk factors from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.

Lancet Public Health. 2025; 10(3):e172-e188.

PMID: 39983748 PMC: 11876102. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(25)00009-X.


Labour's 10 year plan for the English NHS.

Alderwick H, Dunn P BMJ. 2025; 388:r298.

PMID: 39952657 PMC: 11826418. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.r298.


Cross-sector collaboration to reduce health inequalities: a qualitative study of local collaboration between health care, social services, and other sectors under health system reforms in England.

Alderwick H, Hutchings A, Mays N BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2613.

PMID: 39334058 PMC: 11438096. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20089-5.


Solving poverty or tackling healthcare inequalities? Qualitative study exploring local interpretations of national policy on health inequalities under new NHS reforms in England.

Alderwick H, Hutchings A, Mays N BMJ Open. 2024; 14(4):e081954.

PMID: 38589267 PMC: 11015303. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081954.