» Articles » PMID: 37018324

Executive Function and the Continued Influence of Misinformation: A Latent-variable Analysis

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2023 Apr 5
PMID 37018324
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Misinformation can continue to influence reasoning after correction; this is known as the continued influence effect (CIE). Theoretical accounts of the CIE suggest failure of two cognitive processes to be causal, namely memory updating and suppression of misinformation reliance. Both processes can also be conceptualised as subcomponents of contemporary executive function (EF) models; specifically, working-memory updating and prepotent-response inhibition. EF may thus predict susceptibility to the CIE. The current study investigated whether individual differences in EF could predict individual differences in CIE susceptibility. Participants completed several measures of EF subcomponents, including those of updating and inhibition, as well as set shifting, and a standard CIE task. The relationship between EF and CIE was then assessed using a correlation analysis of the EF and CIE measures, as well as structural equation modelling of the EF-subcomponent latent variable and CIE latent variable. Results showed that EF can predict susceptibility to the CIE, especially the factor of working-memory updating. These results further our understanding of the CIE's cognitive antecedents and provide potential directions for real-world CIE intervention.

Citing Articles

Fluid intelligence but not need for cognition is associated with attitude change in response to the correction of misinformation.

Hutmacher F, Appel M, Schatzlein B, Mengelkamp C Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024; 9(1):64.

PMID: 39292332 PMC: 11411052. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-024-00595-1.

References
1.
Rey-Mermet A, Gade M, Oberauer K . Should we stop thinking about inhibition? Searching for individual and age differences in inhibition ability. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017; 44(4):501-526. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000450. View

2.
Salthouse T . Relations between cognitive abilities and measures of executive functioning. Neuropsychology. 2005; 19(4):532-545. DOI: 10.1037/0894-4105.19.4.532. View

3.
Karr J, Areshenkoff C, Rast P, Hofer S, Iverson G, Garcia-Barrera M . The unity and diversity of executive functions: A systematic review and re-analysis of latent variable studies. Psychol Bull. 2018; 144(11):1147-1185. PMC: 6197939. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000160. View

4.
Ecker U, Lewandowsky S, Tang D . Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation. Mem Cognit. 2010; 38(8):1087-100. DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.8.1087. View

5.
Miyake A, Friedman N, Emerson M, Witzki A, Howerter A, Wager T . The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol. 2000; 41(1):49-100. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734. View