» Articles » PMID: 37017498

Monte Carlo Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding in Dynamic Treatment Regimes

Overview
Journal Biom J
Specialty Public Health
Date 2023 Apr 5
PMID 37017498
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Data-driven methods for personalizing treatment assignment have garnered much attention from clinicians and researchers. Dynamic treatment regimes formalize this through a sequence of decision rules that map individual patient characteristics to a recommended treatment. Observational studies are commonly used for estimating dynamic treatment regimes due to the potentially prohibitive costs of conducting sequential multiple assignment randomized trials. However, estimating a dynamic treatment regime from observational data can lead to bias in the estimated regime due to unmeasured confounding. Sensitivity analyses are useful for assessing how robust the conclusions of the study are to a potential unmeasured confounder. A Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis is a probabilistic approach that involves positing and sampling from distributions for the parameters governing the bias. We propose a method for performing a Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis of the bias due to unmeasured confounding in the estimation of dynamic treatment regimes. We demonstrate the performance of the proposed procedure with a simulation study and apply it to an observational study examining tailoring the use of antidepressant medication for reducing symptoms of depression using data from Kaiser Permanente Washington.

Citing Articles

NO UNMEASURED CONFOUNDING: KNOWN UNKNOWNS OR… NOT?.

Schulz J, Moodie E, Shortreed S Am J Epidemiol. 2023; 192(9):1604-1605.

PMID: 37280737 PMC: 10666970. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwad133.

References
1.
Luppino F, de Wit L, Bouvy P, Stijnen T, Cuijpers P, Penninx B . Overweight, obesity, and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010; 67(3):220-9. DOI: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.2. View

2.
Murray T, Yuan Y, Thall P . A Bayesian Machine Learning Approach for Optimizing Dynamic Treatment Regimes. J Am Stat Assoc. 2019; 113(523):1255-1267. PMC: 6366650. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2017.1340887. View

3.
Moodie E, Richardson T . Estimating Optimal Dynamic Regimes: Correcting Bias under the Null: [Optimal dynamic regimes: bias correction]. Scand Stat Theory Appl. 2010; 37(1):126-146. PMC: 2880540. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9469.2009.00661.x. View

4.
Lin D, Psaty B, Kronmal R . Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studies. Biometrics. 1998; 54(3):948-63. View

5.
Cornfield J, Haenszel W, HAMMOND E, LILIENFELD A, SHIMKIN M, Wynder E . Smoking and lung cancer: recent evidence and a discussion of some questions. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959; 22(1):173-203. View