» Articles » PMID: 37016720

The Impact of Confounders on Symptom-Endoscopic Discordances in Crohn's Disease

Overview
Date 2023 Apr 5
PMID 37016720
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Discordances between clinical and endoscopic Crohn's disease (CD) activity indices negatively impact the utility of clinic visits and efficacy assessments in clinical trials. Bile acid diarrhea (BAD) and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) mimic CD symptoms. This study quantified the impact of BAD and SIBO on the relationship between clinical and endoscopic disease activity indices.

Methods: CD patients with 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (7C4) serum measurements and/or SIBO breath tests and matched clinical and endoscopic scores were included. Clinical remission (stool frequency [SF] ≤ 1 and abdominal pain score ≤ 1) rates were compared between those with and without (1) endoscopic remission, (2) BAD (7C4 > 55 ng/mL), and (3) SIBO.

Results: Of 295 CD patients, 219 had SIBO testing and 87 had 7C4 testing. Patients with elevated 7C4 had lower proportions with clinical remission (14% vs 40%, = .007) and SF ≤ 1 (14% vs 42%, = .004) compared to those with normal 7C4. In patients with normal 7C4, higher rates of clinical remission (65% vs 27%, = .01) and SF ≤ 1 (71% vs 27%, = .003) existed in patients with endoscopic remission compared to those without endoscopic remission. Conversely, among the entire 295 patient cohorts, nearly identical clinical remission rates existed between those with and without endoscopic remission (25% vs 24%, = .8), and the Crohn's Disease Patient-Reported Outcome-2 score was not accurate for predicting endoscopic remission (Area Under the Curve (AUC): 0.48; 95% CI, 0.42-0.55). SIBO status did not impact clinical remission rates ( = 1.0).

Conclusions: BAD, but not SIBO, contributed to symptom scores. A relationship between endoscopic inflammation and clinical remission rates only existed in patients without 7C4 elevations.

Citing Articles

Prevalence and predictors of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in inflammatory bowel disease: a meta-analysis.

Feng X, Hu J, Zhang X Front Med (Lausanne). 2025; 11:1490506.

PMID: 39906350 PMC: 11792544. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1490506.

References
1.
Grace E, Shaw C, Whelan K, Andreyev H . Review article: small intestinal bacterial overgrowth--prevalence, clinical features, current and developing diagnostic tests, and treatment. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013; 38(7):674-88. DOI: 10.1111/apt.12456. View

2.
Battat R, Sandborn W . Advances in the Comprehensive Management of Postoperative Crohn's Disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021; 20(7):1436-1449. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.03.048. View

3.
Saad R, Chey W . Breath testing for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: maximizing test accuracy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 12(12):1964-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.09.055. View

4.
Sandborn W, Feagan B, Loftus Jr E, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Van Assche G, DHaens G . Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in a Randomized Trial of Patients With Crohn's Disease. Gastroenterology. 2020; 158(8):2123-2138.e8. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.01.047. View

5.
Vijayvargiya P, Camilleri M, Taylor A, Busciglio I, Loftus Jr E, Donato L . Combined Fasting Serum C4 and Primary Bile Acids From a Single Stool Sample to Diagnose Bile Acid Diarrhea. Gastroenterology. 2020; 159(5):1952-1954.e2. PMC: 7680346. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.07.001. View