» Articles » PMID: 37016447

Low Intensity Psychological Interventions for the Treatment of Feeding and Eating Disorders: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal J Eat Disord
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2023 Apr 4
PMID 37016447
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Feeding and eating disorders are associated with significant illness burden and costs, yet access to evidence-based care is limited. Low intensity psychological interventions have the potential to increase such access.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on the use of low intensity psychological interventions for the treatment of feeding and eating disorders. Studies comparing low intensity psychological interventions against high intensity therapies and non-eating disorder specific psychological interventions were included, as well as those with waiting list control arms. There were three primary outcomes: eating disorder psychopathology, diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM) severity specifier-related outcomes and rates of remission/recovery.

Results: Thirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 3665 participants, and 30 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to high intensity therapies, low intensity psychological interventions were equivalent on reducing eating disorder psychopathology (g = - 0.13), more effective at improving DSM severity specifier-related outcomes (g = - 0.15), but less likely to achieve remission/recovery (risk ratio (RR) = 0.70). Low intensity psychological interventions were superior to non-eating disorder specific psychological interventions and waiting list controls across all three primary outcomes.

Conclusion: Overall, findings suggest that low intensity psychological interventions can successfully treat eating disorder symptoms. Few potential moderators had a statistically significant effect on outcome. The number of studies for many comparisons was low and the methodological quality of the studies was poor, therefore results should be interpreted with caution. More research is needed to establish the effectiveness of low intensity psychological interventions for children and young people, as well as for individuals with anorexia nervosa, avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, pica and rumination disorder.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of written emotional disclosure interventions for eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wang Y, Xu T, Tao Y, Cai X Front Nutr. 2024; 11:1476956.

PMID: 39720356 PMC: 11667891. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1476956.


Clinical benefits of modifying the evening light environment in an acute psychiatric unit: A single-centre, two-arm, parallel-group, pragmatic effectiveness randomised controlled trial.

Kallestad H, Langsrud K, Rae Simpson M, Vestergaard C, Vethe D, Kjorstad K PLoS Med. 2024; 21(12):e1004380.

PMID: 39642162 PMC: 11661622. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004380.


It's just how we do it: social processes in rapid weight loss for combat sports.

Wilbraham S, Elliott D, Miller P Health Psychol Behav Med. 2024; 12(1):2433517.

PMID: 39624786 PMC: 11610240. DOI: 10.1080/21642850.2024.2433517.


"The only way that they can access help quickly": a qualitative exploration of key stakeholders' perspectives on guided self-help interventions for children and young people with eating disorders.

Davey E, Micali N, Bryant-Waugh R, Bennett S, Lau C, Shafran R J Eat Disord. 2024; 12(1):149.

PMID: 39350141 PMC: 11441004. DOI: 10.1186/s40337-024-01113-w.


Family therapy and cognitive behavior therapy for eating disorders in children and adolescents in routine clinical care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wergeland G, Ghaderi A, Fjermestad K, Enebrink P, Halsaa L, Njardvik U Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024; 34(3):883-902.

PMID: 39190154 DOI: 10.1007/s00787-024-02544-1.


References
1.
Haug T, Nordgreen T, Ost L, Havik O . Self-help treatment of anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of effects and potential moderators. Clin Psychol Rev. 2012; 32(5):425-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.04.002. View

2.
Traviss G, Heywood-Everett S, Hill A . Guided self-help for disordered eating: A randomised control trial. Behav Res Ther. 2010; 49(1):25-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.10.007. View

3.
Ali K, Farrer L, Fassnacht D, Gulliver A, Bauer S, Griffiths K . Perceived barriers and facilitators towards help-seeking for eating disorders: A systematic review. Int J Eat Disord. 2016; 50(1):9-21. DOI: 10.1002/eat.22598. View

4.
Schmidt U, Andiappan M, Grover M, Robinson S, Perkins S, Dugmore O . Randomised controlled trial of CD-ROM-based cognitive-behavioural self-care for bulimia nervosa. Br J Psychiatry. 2008; 193(6):493-500. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.046607. View

5.
Winters M, Weir A . Grey matters; on the importance of publication bias in systematic reviews. Br J Sports Med. 2016; 51(6):488-489. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096679. View