» Articles » PMID: 37016416

Stratified Assessment of an FDA-cleared Deep Learning Algorithm for Automated Detection and Contouring of Metastatic Brain Tumors in Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Abstract

Purpose: Artificial intelligence-based tools can be leveraged to improve detection and segmentation of brain metastases for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). VBrain by Vysioneer Inc. is a deep learning algorithm with recent FDA clearance to assist in brain tumor contouring. We aimed to assess the performance of this tool by various demographic and clinical characteristics among patients with brain metastases treated with SRS.

Materials And Methods: We randomly selected 100 patients with brain metastases who underwent initial SRS on the CyberKnife from 2017 to 2020 at a single institution. Cases with resection cavities were excluded from the analysis. Computed tomography (CT) and axial T1-weighted post-contrast magnetic resonance (MR) image data were extracted for each patient and uploaded to VBrain. A brain metastasis was considered "detected" when the VBrain- "predicted" contours overlapped with the corresponding physician contours ("ground-truth" contours). We evaluated performance of VBrain against ground-truth contours using the following metrics: lesion-wise Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), lesion-wise average Hausdorff distance (AVD), false positive count (FP), and lesion-wise sensitivity (%). Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed to assess the relationships between patient characteristics including sex, race, primary histology, age, and size and number of brain metastases, and performance metrics such as DSC, AVD, FP, and sensitivity.

Results: We analyzed 100 patients with 435 intact brain metastases treated with SRS. Our cohort consisted of patients with a median number of 2 brain metastases (range: 1 to 52), median age of 69 (range: 19 to 91), and 50% male and 50% female patients. The primary site breakdown was 56% lung, 10% melanoma, 9% breast, 8% gynecological, 5% renal, 4% gastrointestinal, 2% sarcoma, and 6% other, while the race breakdown was 60% White, 18% Asian, 3% Black/African American, 2% Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, and 17% other/unknown/not reported. The median tumor size was 0.112 c.c. (range: 0.010-26.475 c.c.). We found mean lesion-wise DSC to be 0.723, mean lesion-wise AVD to be 7.34% of lesion size (0.704 mm), mean FP count to be 0.72 tumors per case, and lesion-wise sensitivity to be 89.30% for all lesions. Moreover, mean sensitivity was found to be 99.07%, 97.59%, and 96.23% for lesions with diameter equal to and greater than 10 mm, 7.5 mm, and 5 mm, respectively. No other significant differences in performance metrics were observed across demographic or clinical characteristic groups.

Conclusion: In this study, a commercial deep learning algorithm showed promising results in segmenting brain metastases, with 96.23% sensitivity for metastases with diameters of 5 mm or higher. As the software is an assistive AI, future work of VBrain integration into the clinical workflow can provide further clinical and research insights.

Citing Articles

Novel radiotherapeutic strategies in the management of brain metastases: Challenging the dogma.

Palmer J, Perlow H, Lehrer E, Wardak Z, Soliman H Neuro Oncol. 2024; 26(12 Suppl 2):S46-S55.

PMID: 38437668 PMC: 10911796. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad260.


Artificial intelligence in neurology: opportunities, challenges, and policy implications.

Voigtlaender S, Pawelczyk J, Geiger M, Vaios E, Karschnia P, Cudkowicz M J Neurol. 2024; 271(5):2258-2273.

PMID: 38367046 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-024-12220-8.


Advancing equitable and personalized cancer care: Novel applications and priorities of artificial intelligence for fairness and inclusivity in the patient care workflow.

Cobanaj M, Corti C, Dee E, McCullum L, Boldrini L, Schlam I Eur J Cancer. 2023; 198:113504.

PMID: 38141549 PMC: 11362966. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113504.


Novel research and future prospects of artificial intelligence in cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Zhang C, Xu J, Tang R, Yang J, Wang W, Yu X J Hematol Oncol. 2023; 16(1):114.

PMID: 38012673 PMC: 10680201. DOI: 10.1186/s13045-023-01514-5.


Segmentation of Brain Metastases Using Background Layer Statistics (BLAST).

Heyn C, Moody A, Tseng C, Wong E, Kang T, Kapadia A AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2023; 44(10):1135-1143.

PMID: 37735088 PMC: 10549939. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7998.


References
1.
Stanley J, Dunscombe P, Lau H, Burns P, Lim G, Liu H . The effect of contouring variability on dosimetric parameters for brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013; 87(5):924-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.09.013. View

2.
Growcott S, Dembrey T, Patel R, Eaton D, Cameron A . Inter-Observer Variability in Target Volume Delineations of Benign and Metastatic Brain Tumours for Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Results of a National Quality Assurance Programme. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2019; 32(1):13-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.06.015. View

3.
Stankiewicz M, Tomasik B, Blamek S . A new prognostic score for predicting survival in patients treated with robotic stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):20347. PMC: 8514560. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-98847-3. View

4.
Kaufmann T, Smits M, Boxerman J, Huang R, Barboriak D, Weller M . Consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol for clinical trials in brain metastases. Neuro Oncol. 2020; 22(6):757-772. PMC: 7283031. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa030. View

5.
Yang Z, Chen M, Kazemimoghadam M, Ma L, Stojadinovic S, Timmerman R . Deep-learning and radiomics ensemble classifier for false positive reduction in brain metastases segmentation. Phys Med Biol. 2021; 67(2). PMC: 8858586. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac4667. View