» Articles » PMID: 37014956

Quantification of Serum Metabolites in Early Colorectal Adenomas Using Isobaric Labeling Mass Spectrometry

Overview
Journal J Proteome Res
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2023 Apr 4
PMID 37014956
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A major challenge in reducing the death rate of colorectal cancer is to screen patients using low-invasive testing. A blood test shows a high compliance rate with reduced invasiveness. In this work, a multiplex isobaric tag labeling strategy coupled with mass spectrometry is adopted to relatively quantify primary and secondary amine-containing metabolites in serum for the discovery of metabolite level changes of colorectal cancer. Serum samples from patients at different risk statuses and colorectal cancer growth statuses are studied. Metabolite identification is based on accurate mass matching and/or retention time of labeled metabolite standards. We quantify 40 metabolites across all the serum samples, including 18 metabolites validated with standards. We find significantly decreased levels of threonine and asparagine in the patients with growing adenomas or high-risk adenomas ( < 0.05). Glutamine levels decrease in patients with adenomas of unknown growth status or high-risk adenomas. In contrast, arginine levels are elevated in patients with low-risk adenoma. Receiver operating characteristic analysis shows high sensitivity and specificity of these metabolites for detecting growing adenomas. Based on these results, we conclude that a few metabolites identified here might contribute to distinguishing colorectal patients with growing adenomas from normal individuals and patients with unknown growth status of adenomas.

Citing Articles

Potential of pre-diagnostic metabolomics for colorectal cancer risk assessment or early detection.

Seum T, Frick C, Cardoso R, Bhardwaj M, Hoffmeister M, Brenner H NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024; 8(1):244.

PMID: 39462072 PMC: 11514036. DOI: 10.1038/s41698-024-00732-5.


Diagnostic performance of serum metabolites biomarker associated with colorectal adenoma: a systematic review.

Abu Bakar M, Chin S, Makpol S, Tan J, Mohammed Nawi A PeerJ. 2024; 12:e18043.

PMID: 39314843 PMC: 11418823. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18043.


High-throughput relative quantification of fatty acids by 12-plex isobaric labeling and microchip capillary electrophoresis - Mass spectrometry.

Wang Z, Li M, Xu S, Sun L, Li L Anal Chim Acta. 2024; 1318:342905.

PMID: 39067909 PMC: 11299455. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2024.342905.

References
1.
Pickhardt P . CT colonography: does it satisfy the necessary criteria for a colorectal screening test?. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014; 8(3):211-3. DOI: 10.1586/17474124.2014.887436. View

2.
Wang J, Zhang Y, Xiang F, Zhang Z, Li L . Combining capillary electrophoresis matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry and stable isotopic labeling techniques for comparative crustacean peptidomics. J Chromatogr A. 2010; 1217(26):4463-70. PMC: 2882495. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.02.084. View

3.
Lieberman D, Moravec M, Holub J, Michaels L, Eisen G . Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography. Gastroenterology. 2008; 135(4):1100-5. PMC: 2581902. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.06.083. View

4.
Nolthenius C, Boellaard T, de Haan M, Nio C, Thomeer M, Bipat S . Evolution of Screen-Detected Small (6-9 mm) Polyps After a 3-Year Surveillance Interval: Assessment of Growth With CT Colonography Compared With Histopathology. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015; 110(12):1682-90. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2015.340. View

5.
Hajian-Tilaki K . Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics. J Biomed Inform. 2014; 48:193-204. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.02.013. View