» Articles » PMID: 37012331

The Evaluation of Tumorigenicity and Characterization of Colonies in a Soft Agar Colony Formation Assay Using Polymerase Chain Reaction

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2023 Apr 3
PMID 37012331
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In regenerative medicine, the tumorigenic potency of cells in cellular therapy products (CTPs) is a major concern for their application to patients. This study presents a method-the soft agar colony formation assay using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-to evaluate tumorigenicity. MRC-5 cells, contaminated with HeLa cells, were cultured for up to 4 weeks in soft agar medium. Cell-proliferation-related mRNAs, Ki-67 and cyclin B, could be detected in 0.01% of HeLa cells after 5 days of culture, whereas cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) could be detected after 2 weeks. On the other hand, CDK2, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and minichromosome maintenance protein 7 (MCM7) were not useful to detect HeLa cells even after 4 weeks of culture. The cancer stem cell (CSC) markers, aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1) and CD133 in 0.01% of HeLa cells, could be detected 2 and 4 weeks after culture, respectively. However, another CSC marker CD44 was not useful because its expression was also detected in MRC-5 cells alone. This study suggests that the application of the PCR method to the soft agar colony formation assay could evaluate not only the tumorigenic potency in the short-term but also characterize the colonies, eventually improving the safety of CTPs.

Citing Articles

The Role of miR-486-5p on CSCs Phenotypes in Colorectal Cancer.

Etzi F, Grinan-Lison C, Fenu G, Gonzalez-Titos A, Pisano A, Farace C Cancers (Basel). 2025; 16(24.

PMID: 39766136 PMC: 11674241. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16244237.


MUC20 regulated by extrachromosomal circular DNA attenuates proteasome inhibitor resistance of multiple myeloma by modulating cuproptosis.

Wang X, Shi Y, Shi H, Liu X, Liao A, Liu Z J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2024; 43(1):68.

PMID: 38439082 PMC: 10913264. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-024-02972-6.

References
1.
Clement F, Grockowiak E, Zylbersztejn F, Fossard G, Gobert S, Maguer-Satta V . Stem cell manipulation, gene therapy and the risk of cancer stem cell emergence. Stem Cell Investig. 2017; 4:67. PMC: 5539392. DOI: 10.21037/sci.2017.07.03. View

2.
Perin E, Silva G . Cell-based therapy for chronic ischemic heart disease--a clinical perspective. Cardiovasc Ther. 2010; 29(3):211-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-5922.2010.00214.x. View

3.
Wuputra K, Ku C, Wu D, Lin Y, Saito S, Yokoyama K . Prevention of tumor risk associated with the reprogramming of human pluripotent stem cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2020; 39(1):100. PMC: 7268627. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-020-01584-0. View

4.
Xu L, Zhang M, Shi L, Yang X, Chen L, Cao N . Neural stemness contributes to cell tumorigenicity. Cell Biosci. 2021; 11(1):21. PMC: 7814647. DOI: 10.1186/s13578-021-00531-6. View

5.
Xu N, Li X, Watanabe M, Ueki H, Hu H, Li N . Induction of cells with prostate cancer stem-like properties from mouse induced pluripotent stem cells via conditioned medium. Am J Cancer Res. 2018; 8(8):1624-1632. PMC: 6129491. View