Impact of Bilingual Face, Arm, Speech, Time (FAST) Public Awareness Campaigns on Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Activation in a Large Canadian Metropolitan Area

Overview

Journal CJEM

Publisher Springer

Specialty Emergency Medicine

Date 2023 Apr 3

PMID 37010730

Authors

Vincent Brissette

Bastien Rioux

Theresa Choisi

Alexandre Y Poppe

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background And Aims: Face, arm, speech, time (FAST) public awareness campaigns improve stroke recognition in the general population. Whether this translates into improved emergency medical services (EMS) activation remains unclear. We assessed the association of five consecutive FAST campaigns with EMS calls for suspected strokes in a large urban area of Quebec, Canada.

Methods: We conducted an observational study to assess data collected between June 2015 and December 2019 by the public EMS agency covering the cities of Laval and Montreal (Quebec, Canada). Five FAST campaigns were held over this period (mean duration: 9 weeks). We compared daily EMS calls before and after all FAST campaigns (2015 vs 2019) with t tests and Mann-Whitney U tests. We used single-group, univariate interrupted time series to measure changes in daily EMS calls for suspected strokes following each FAST campaign (stroke categories: any, symptom onset < 5 h, Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale [CPSS] 3/3). Calls for headache served as negative control.

Results: After five FAST campaigns, mean daily EMS calls increased by 28% (p < 0.001) for any suspected stroke and by 61% (p < 0.001) for stroke with symptom onset < 5 h, compared to 10.1% for headache (p = 0.012). Significant increases in daily EMS calls were observed after three campaigns (highest OR = 1.26; 95% CI 1.11, 1.43; p < 0.001). There were no significant changes in calls after individual campaigns for suspected stroke with symptom onset < 5 h, or suspected stroke with CPSS 3/3.

Conclusions: We observed an inconsistent impact of individual FAST campaigns on EMS calls for any suspected stroke, and did not observe significant EMS call changes after individual campaigns for acute (< 5 h) and severe (CPSS 3/3) strokes. These results may help stakeholders identify potential benefits and limitations of public awareness campaigns using the FAST acronym.

Citing Articles

BE FAST Versus FAST: A Randomized Pilot Trial Comparing Retention of Stroke Symptoms Between 2 Mnemonics.

Darkhabani M, Homa-Bonell J, Thoreson L, Bobholz J, Spaulding D, Engebose M J Am Heart Assoc. 2024; 13(19):e035696.

PMID: 39291473 PMC: 11681435. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.123.035696.

Parallel activation of helicopter and ground transportation after dispatcher identification of suspected anterior large vessel occlusion stroke in rural areas: a proof-of-concept case with modeling from the LESTOR trial.

Henningsen M, Herrmann M, Meier S, Bergmann U, Busch H, Taschner C Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024; 32(1):62.

PMID: 38971748 PMC: 11227698. DOI: 10.1186/s13049-024-01233-x.

References

Matsuo R, Yamaguchi Y, Matsushita T, Hata J, Kiyuna F, Fukuda K . Association Between Onset-to-Door Time and Clinical Outcomes After Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. 2017; 48(11):3049-3056. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018132. View

Lachkhem Y, Rican S, Minvielle E . Understanding delays in acute stroke care: a systematic review of reviews. Eur J Public Health. 2018; 28(3):426-433. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cky066. View

Rioux B, Brissette V, Marin F, Lindsay P, Keezer M, Poppe A . The Impact of Stroke Public Awareness Campaigns Differs Between Sociodemographic Groups. Can J Neurol Sci. 2021; 49(2):231-238. DOI: 10.1017/cjn.2021.76. View

Chen S, Sun H, Zhao X, Fu P, Yan W, Yilong W . Effects of comprehensive education protocol in decreasing pre-hospital stroke delay among Chinese urban community population. Neurol Res. 2013; 35(5):522-8. DOI: 10.1179/1743132813Y.0000000203. View

Wojner-Alexandrov A, Alexandrov A, Rodriguez D, Persse D, Grotta J . Houston paramedic and emergency stroke treatment and outcomes study (HoPSTO). Stroke. 2005; 36(7):1512-8. DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000170700.45340.39. View

Luiz T, Moosmann A, Koch C, Behrens S, Daffertshofer M, Ellinger K . [Optimized logistics in the prehospital management of acute stroke]. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2001; 36(12):735-41. DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-18981. View

Fogle C, Oser C, McNamara M, Helgerson S, Gohdes D, Harwell T . Impact of media on community awareness of stroke warning signs: a comparison study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010; 19(5):370-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2009.06.007. View

Hodgson C, Lindsay P, Rubini F . Can mass media influence emergency department visits for stroke?. Stroke. 2007; 38(7):2115-22. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.484071. View

Clawson J, Scott G, Gardett I, Youngquist S, Taillac P, Fivaz C . Predictive Ability of an Emergency Medical Dispatch Stroke Diagnostic Tool in Identifying Hospital-Confirmed Strokes. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016; 25(8):2031-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.04.021. View

10.

Govindarajan P, Ghilarducci D, McCulloch C, Pierog J, Bloom E, Johnston C . Comparative evaluation of stroke triage algorithms for emergency medical dispatchers (MeDS): prospective cohort study protocol. BMC Neurol. 2011; 11:14. PMC: 3042392. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-11-14. View

11.

Kothari R, Pancioli A, Liu T, Brott T, Broderick J . Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale: reproducibility and validity. Ann Emerg Med. 1999; 33(4):373-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70299-4. View

12.

Bhaskaran K, Gasparrini A, Hajat S, Smeeth L, Armstrong B . Time series regression studies in environmental epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 2013; 42(4):1187-95. PMC: 3780998. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyt092. View

13.

Bejot Y, Bailly H, Graber M, Garnier L, Laville A, Dubourget L . Impact of the Ageing Population on the Burden of Stroke: The Dijon Stroke Registry. Neuroepidemiology. 2019; 52(1-2):78-85. DOI: 10.1159/000492820. View

14.

Bray J, Straney L, Barger B, Finn J . Effect of public awareness campaigns on calls to ambulance across Australia. Stroke. 2015; 46(5):1377-80. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.008515. View

15.

Gordon C, Bell R, Ranta A . Impact of the national public 'FAST' campaigns. N Z Med J. 2019; 132(1507):48-56. View

16.

Bernal J, Cummins S, Gasparrini A . Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial. Int J Epidemiol. 2016; 46(1):348-355. PMC: 5407170. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyw098. View

17.

Yafasova A, Fosbol E, Johnsen S, Kruuse C, Petersen J, Alhakak A . Time to Thrombolysis and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Nationwide Study. Stroke. 2021; 52(5):1724-1732. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032837. View

18.

Saver J, Goyal M, van der Lugt A, Menon B, Majoie C, Dippel D . Time to Treatment With Endovascular Thrombectomy and Outcomes From Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016; 316(12):1279-88. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.13647. View

19.

Jahan R, Saver J, Schwamm L, Fonarow G, Liang L, Matsouaka R . Association Between Time to Treatment With Endovascular Reperfusion Therapy and Outcomes in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated in Clinical Practice. JAMA. 2019; 322(3):252-263. PMC: 6635908. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.8286. View

20.

Adeoye O, Lindsell C, Broderick J, Alwell K, Jauch E, Moomaw C . Emergency medical services use by stroke patients: a population-based study. Am J Emerg Med. 2009; 27(2):141-5. PMC: 2686130. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.02.004. View