Behaviour Change Interventions for Responsible Antimicrobial Use on Farms
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: In the coming years, major governance changes in the form of policy directives and regulations will catalyse major top-down change with respect to animal health on European farms in an effort to combat the OneHealth threat of antimicrobial resistance. This top-down approach must be met with bottom-up strategies to ensure target actors (namely, farmers and vets) are supported and motivated to change their practices, thus, avoiding unintended consequences of forced change. Although much behavioural research has explored the factors influencing antimicrobial practices on farms, a gap exists translating these findings into evidence-based behaviour change interventions that can be put into practice. The current study aims to fill this gap. It provides insights into identifying, understanding, and changing the behaviours of farmers and veterinarians with respect to the responsible use of antimicrobials in farming.
Results: Through an inter-disciplinary and multi-actor approach, the study combines scientific knowledge from the behavioural sciences and animal health sciences, coupled with tacit knowledge from a co-design, participatory approach to recommend seven behaviour change interventions that can help to support good practices amongst farmers and vets, with respect to animal health, and reduce the use of antimicrobials on farms. The behaviour change interventions include message framing; OneHealth awareness campaign; specialised communications training; on-farm visual prompts and tools; social support strategies (for both farmers and vets); and antimicrobial use monitoring. The study details each intervention with respect to their evidence base and scientific concept, grounded in behavioural science, along with stakeholder feedback on design and delivery of the interventions.
Conclusions: These behaviour change interventions can be taken, adapted, and put into practice by the agri-food community to support good animal health practices and responsible antimicrobial use on farms.
Omani R, Fasina F, Kimeli P, Antoine-Moussiaux N Vet Sci. 2025; 12(2).
PMID: 40005932 PMC: 11860433. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci12020172.
Shano S, Kalam M, Afrose S, Rahman M, Akter S, Uddin M PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0315246.
PMID: 39680579 PMC: 11649135. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315246.
Evaluation of a scheme to identify risks for tail biting in pigs.
DAlessio R, Mc Aloon C, Correia-Gomes C, Hanlon A, ODriscoll K PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0305960.
PMID: 39208060 PMC: 11361435. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305960.
An economic assessment of alternative antimicrobial use scenarios on pig farms.
Shrestha S, da Costa M, Correia-Gomes C, Nevel A, McGowan A, Tongue S Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1381499.
PMID: 38746928 PMC: 11091415. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1381499.
Ui Chearbhaill A, Bolona P, Ryan E, McAloon C, Burrell A, McAloon C Ir Vet J. 2024; 77(1):8.
PMID: 38711109 PMC: 11071209. DOI: 10.1186/s13620-024-00267-y.