» Articles » PMID: 37009876

Behaviour Change Interventions for Responsible Antimicrobial Use on Farms

Overview
Journal Ir Vet J
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2023 Apr 3
PMID 37009876
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In the coming years, major governance changes in the form of policy directives and regulations will catalyse major top-down change with respect to animal health on European farms in an effort to combat the OneHealth threat of antimicrobial resistance. This top-down approach must be met with bottom-up strategies to ensure target actors (namely, farmers and vets) are supported and motivated to change their practices, thus, avoiding unintended consequences of forced change. Although much behavioural research has explored the factors influencing antimicrobial practices on farms, a gap exists translating these findings into evidence-based behaviour change interventions that can be put into practice. The current study aims to fill this gap. It provides insights into identifying, understanding, and changing the behaviours of farmers and veterinarians with respect to the responsible use of antimicrobials in farming.

Results: Through an inter-disciplinary and multi-actor approach, the study combines scientific knowledge from the behavioural sciences and animal health sciences, coupled with tacit knowledge from a co-design, participatory approach to recommend seven behaviour change interventions that can help to support good practices amongst farmers and vets, with respect to animal health, and reduce the use of antimicrobials on farms. The behaviour change interventions include message framing; OneHealth awareness campaign; specialised communications training; on-farm visual prompts and tools; social support strategies (for both farmers and vets); and antimicrobial use monitoring. The study details each intervention with respect to their evidence base and scientific concept, grounded in behavioural science, along with stakeholder feedback on design and delivery of the interventions.

Conclusions: These behaviour change interventions can be taken, adapted, and put into practice by the agri-food community to support good animal health practices and responsible antimicrobial use on farms.

Citing Articles

Application of Behavior Change Techniques (BCTTv1) to Reduce Antimicrobial Use in Livestock: A Scoping Review.

Omani R, Fasina F, Kimeli P, Antoine-Moussiaux N Vet Sci. 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 40005932 PMC: 11860433. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci12020172.


An application of COM-b model to explore factors influencing veterinarians' antimicrobial prescription behaviors: Findings from a qualitative study in Bangladesh.

Shano S, Kalam M, Afrose S, Rahman M, Akter S, Uddin M PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0315246.

PMID: 39680579 PMC: 11649135. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315246.


Evaluation of a scheme to identify risks for tail biting in pigs.

DAlessio R, Mc Aloon C, Correia-Gomes C, Hanlon A, ODriscoll K PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0305960.

PMID: 39208060 PMC: 11361435. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305960.


An economic assessment of alternative antimicrobial use scenarios on pig farms.

Shrestha S, da Costa M, Correia-Gomes C, Nevel A, McGowan A, Tongue S Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1381499.

PMID: 38746928 PMC: 11091415. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1381499.


Survey of farm, parlour and milking management, parlour technologies, SCC control strategies and farmer demographics on Irish dairy farms.

Ui Chearbhaill A, Bolona P, Ryan E, McAloon C, Burrell A, McAloon C Ir Vet J. 2024; 77(1):8.

PMID: 38711109 PMC: 11071209. DOI: 10.1186/s13620-024-00267-y.

References
1.
Mayor E, Eicher V, Bangerter A, Gilles I, Clemence A, Green E . Dynamic social representations of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic: Shifting patterns of sense-making and blame. Public Underst Sci. 2013; 22(8):1011-24. DOI: 10.1177/0963662512443326. View

2.
Morgans L, Bolt S, Bruno-McClung E, van Dijk L, Escobar M, Buller H . A participatory, farmer-led approach to changing practices around antimicrobial use on UK farms. J Dairy Sci. 2020; 104(2):2212-2230. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2020-18874. View

3.
Vigors B . Citizens' and Farmers' Framing of 'Positive Animal Welfare' and the Implications for Framing Positive Welfare in Communication. Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(4). PMC: 6523948. DOI: 10.3390/ani9040147. View

4.
Leger A, Lambraki I, Graells T, Cousins M, Henriksson P, Harbarth S . AMR-Intervene: a social-ecological framework to capture the diversity of actions to tackle antimicrobial resistance from a One Health perspective. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020; 76(1):1-21. PMC: 8314113. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkaa394. View

5.
Rees G, Bard A, Reyher K . Designing a National Veterinary Prescribing Champion Programme for Welsh Veterinary Practices: The Arwain Vet Cymru Project. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021; 10(3). PMC: 7998244. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10030253. View