» Articles » PMID: 37008604

Insights into Measuring Health Disparities Using Electronic Health Records from a Statewide Network of Health Systems: A Case Study

Overview
Date 2023 Apr 3
PMID 37008604
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Within Wisconsin, our residents experience some of the worst health disparities in the nation. Public reporting on disparities in the quality of care is important to achieving accountability for reducing disparities over time and has been associated with improvements in care. Disparities reporting using statewide electronic health records (EHR) data would allow efficient and regular reporting, but there are significant challenges with missing data and data harmonization. We report our experience in creating a statewide, centralized EHR data repository to support health systems in reducing health disparities through public reporting. We partnered with the Wisconsin Collaborative for Healthcare Quality (the "Collaborative"), which houses patient-level EHR data from 25 health systems including validated metrics of healthcare quality. We undertook a detailed assessment of potential disparity indicators (race and ethnicity, insurance status and type, and geographic disparity). Challenges for each indicator are described, with solutions encompassing internal (health system) harmonization, central (Collaborative) harmonization, and centralized data processing. Key lessons include engaging health systems in identifying disparity indicators, aligning with system priorities, measuring indicators already collected in the EHR to minimize burden, and facilitating workgroups with health systems to build relationships, improve data collection, and develop initiatives to address disparities in healthcare.

Citing Articles

Assessment and ascertainment in psychiatric molecular genetics: challenges and opportunities for cross-disorder research.

Cai N, Verhulst B, Andreassen O, Buitelaar J, Edenberg H, Hettema J Mol Psychiatry. 2024; .

PMID: 39730880 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-024-02878-x.


Realizing the potential of social determinants data in EHR systems: A scoping review of approaches for screening, linkage, extraction, analysis, and interventions.

Li C, Mowery D, Ma X, Yang R, Vurgun U, Hwang S J Clin Transl Sci. 2024; 8(1):e147.

PMID: 39478779 PMC: 11523026. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2024.571.


Harnessing EHR data for health research.

Tang A, Woldemariam S, Miramontes S, Norgeot B, Oskotsky T, Sirota M Nat Med. 2024; 30(7):1847-1855.

PMID: 38965433 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-03074-8.


Automated Extraction of Stroke Severity from Unstructured Electronic Health Records using Natural Language Processing.

Fernandes M, Westover M, Singhal A, Zafar S medRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38559062 PMC: 10980121. DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.08.24304011.

References
1.
Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J . Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q. 2005; 83(3):457-502. PMC: 2690145. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x. View

2.
Roski J, McClellan M . Measuring health care performance now, not tomorrow: essential steps to support effective health reform. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011; 30(4):682-9. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0137. View

3.
Franks P, Fiscella K . Reducing disparities downstream: prospects and challenges. J Gen Intern Med. 2008; 23(5):672-7. PMC: 2324139. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0509-0. View

4.
Casalino L, Gans D, Weber R, Cea M, Tuchovsky A, Bishop T . US Physician Practices Spend More Than $15.4 Billion Annually To Report Quality Measures. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016; 35(3):401-6. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1258. View

5.
DeVoe J, Fryer G, Phillips R, Green L . Receipt of preventive care among adults: insurance status and usual source of care. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93(5):786-91. PMC: 1447840. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.93.5.786. View