» Articles » PMID: 37008503

Knockout of ElF4E Using CRISPR/Cas9 for Large-scale Production of Resistant Cucumber Cultivar Against WMV, ZYMV, and PRSV

Overview
Journal Front Plant Sci
Date 2023 Apr 3
PMID 37008503
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

CRISPR/Cas9 is one of the most robust technologies for plant breeding enabling precise and efficient modifications in a genome. This technology is being used for the manipulation of target genes in a host to develop resistance against the plant pathogens. is one of the target genes playing a key role in viral infection during interaction with potyvirus viral proteins genome linked (VPg). Nevertheless, the allelic and positional effect of mutations in is to be clarified in -VPg interaction. In addition, there are entanglements in the massive production of pathogen-resistant cultivars suitable for commercial production using CRISPR/Cas9 technology. Therefore, we targeted different positions of the in G27 and G247 inbred lines, using specific gRNA1 and gRNA2 for the first and third exons, respectively, and 1,221 transgene-free plants were selected in segregated T1 generation, where 192 G27 and 79 G247 plants had the least mutation at Cas9 cleavage site of gRNA1 or gRNA2. Crossing was performed to see allelic effects of mutations in F1 populations, which were homozygous and heterozygous single (elF4E_1 or elF4E_3) and double (elF4E_1-3) mutants. Disease symptoms of watermelon mosaic virus (WMV), papaya ringspot virus (PRSV), and zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV) were evaluated in both non-edited and edited F1 plants, and we did not observe any symptom in homozygous elF4E_1-3 and elF4E_1 mutants. However, homozygous elF4E_3 was positive in reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), even if there were no significant symptoms on the inoculated leaves. ELISA and qRT-PCR indicated lower viral accumulation in homozygous elF4E_3 than heterozygous and non-edited plants. Regeneration and transformation protocols were also optimized comprehensively for both the genotypes. The average number of shoots/100 explants was determined for both G27 and G247 as 13.6 and 18.0, respectively. We could not detect any distinguishing difference between the non-edited and edited F1 plants for yield and morphology. Our results demonstrate an effective route for mass production of viral resistant cultivars of cucumber to WMV, ZYMV, and PRSV. In this way, the pathogen-resistant cultivars could be generated to reduce the losses caused by these pathogens in cucumber production.

Citing Articles

Advancing vegetable genetics with gene editing: a pathway to food security and nutritional resilience in climate-shifted environments.

Roychowdhury R, Das S, Das S, Biswas S, Patel M, Kumar A Funct Integr Genomics. 2025; 25(1):31.

PMID: 39891757 DOI: 10.1007/s10142-025-01533-0.


Editing in the Watermelon Genome Using CRISPR/Cas9 Technology Confers Resistance to ZYMV.

Li M, Qiu Y, Zhu D, Xu X, Tian S, Wang J Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(21).

PMID: 39519021 PMC: 11546804. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252111468.


Molecular approaches for the management of papaya ringspot virus infecting papaya: a comprehensive review.

Jyotika R, Harish S, Karthikeyan G, Kumar K, Murugan M, Jayakanthan M Mol Biol Rep. 2024; 51(1):981.

PMID: 39269576 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-024-09920-9.


A natural substitution of a conserved amino acid in eIF4E confers resistance against multiple potyviruses.

Zhou L, Tian Y, Ren L, Yan Z, Jiang J, Shi Q Mol Plant Pathol. 2024; 25(1):e13418.

PMID: 38279849 PMC: 10777747. DOI: 10.1111/mpp.13418.

References
1.
Nitsch J, Nitsch C . Haploid plants from pollen grains. Science. 1969; 163(3862):85-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.163.3862.85. View

2.
Revers F, Garcia J . Molecular biology of potyviruses. Adv Virus Res. 2015; 92:101-99. DOI: 10.1016/bs.aivir.2014.11.006. View

3.
Gao Z, Johansen E, Eyers S, Thomas C, Ellis T, J Maule A . The potyvirus recessive resistance gene, sbm1, identifies a novel role for translation initiation factor eIF4E in cell-to-cell trafficking. Plant J. 2004; 40(3):376-85. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02215.x. View

4.
Sonenberg N, Gingras A . The mRNA 5' cap-binding protein eIF4E and control of cell growth. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1998; 10(2):268-75. DOI: 10.1016/s0955-0674(98)80150-6. View

5.
Engler J, Favery B, Engler G, Abad P . Loss of susceptibility as an alternative for nematode resistance. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2005; 16(2):112-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2005.01.009. View