» Articles » PMID: 37007922

Opportunity Cost of Retinal Detachment Surgery Vs Office-Based Patient Care

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2023 Apr 3
PMID 37007922
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This work compares physician reimbursements for retinal detachment (RD) surgery with office-based patient care. A theoretical model was constructed from the physician's perspective for performing a 90-minute uncomplicated RD surgery with its associated perioperative work in the global period (Current Procedural Terminology code 67108) compared with managing 40 patients per 8-hour clinic day in the equivalent time period. The reimbursement rates were based on the 2019 values set by the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Sensitivity analyses were performed varying the perioperative times, clinical productivity, and postoperative visits. The CMS physician reimbursement rate for 67108 surgery was 17.13 work relative value units (wRVUs); meanwhile, the physician in the reference case could have generated 40.89 wRVUs in the office. CMS reimbursement therefore represented a 58% opportunity cost relative to lost office productivity for the physician. A significant disparity was still present even when modeling 30 patients per day. In sensitivity analyses, clinical productivity exceeded surgical compensation in 99% of modeled scenarios. In threshold analyses, the surgeon in the reference case would have to complete the surgery and all immediate perioperative care within 18 minutes to equal the total CMS valuation. CMS reimbursement for RD surgery resulted in a significant opportunity cost for the physician relative to office-based patient care, which was more pronounced for more efficient clinicians in the office. The sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of the model. Reductions in surgery reimbursements relative to office-based patient care might disincentivize busy clinicians.

Citing Articles

Cost Drivers of Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Retinal Detachment: Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Analysis.

Haliyur R, Portney D, Pan W, Mian S, Rao R J Vitreoretin Dis. 2024; 24741264241279624.

PMID: 39539821 PMC: 11556315. DOI: 10.1177/24741264241279624.


Opportunity Cost of Vitreoretinal Surgeries.

Leung E, Patel S, Reddy R, Boucher N, Sharma C, Blim J J Vitreoretin Dis. 2023; 7(4):275-280.

PMID: 37927325 PMC: 10621695. DOI: 10.1177/24741264231178590.


The Cost of Standard and Complex Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Retinal Detachment Repair Exceeds Its Reimbursement.

Pan W, Portney D, Mian S, Rao R Ophthalmol Retina. 2023; 7(11):948-953.

PMID: 37399975 PMC: 11186401. DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2023.06.021.

References
1.
Brown M, Brown G, Sharma S, Landy J . Health care economic analyses and value-based medicine. Surv Ophthalmol. 2003; 48(2):204-23. DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6257(02)00457-5. View

2.
Ma Y, Ying X, Zou H, Xu X, Liu H, Bai L . Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery in elderly people over 70 years old: visual acuity, quality of life, and cost-utility values. PLoS One. 2014; 9(10):e110256. PMC: 4201523. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110256. View

3.
Berkowitz S, Sternberg Jr P, Patel S . Cost Analysis of Routine Vitrectomy Surgery. Ophthalmol Retina. 2021; 5(6):496-502. DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2021.02.003. View

4.
Hoballah J, Liao J, Salameh M, Weigel R . Physician reimbursement for general surgical procedures in the last century: 1906-2006. J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 206(4):670-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.11.008. View

5.
Childers C, Maggard-Gibbons M . Assessment of the Contribution of the Work Relative Value Unit Scale to Differences in Physician Compensation Across Medical and Surgical Specialties. JAMA Surg. 2020; 155(6):493-501. PMC: 7160740. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0422. View