» Articles » PMID: 36998163

Promising Zone Two-stage Design for a Single-arm Study with Binary Outcome

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialties Public Health
Science
Date 2023 Mar 31
PMID 36998163
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Adaptive designs are increasingly used in clinical trials to assess the effectiveness of new drugs. For a single-arm study with a binary outcome, several adaptive designs were developed by using numerical search algorithms and the conditional power approach. The design based on numerical search algorithms is able to identify the global optimal design, but the computational intensity limits the usage of these designs. The conditional power approach searches for the optimal design without expensive computing time. In addition, promising zone strategy was proposed to move on drug development to the follow-up stages when the interim results are promising. We propose to develop two adaptive designs: One based on the conditional power approach, and the other based on the promising zone strategy. These two designs preserve types I and II error rates. It is preferable to satisfy the monotonic property for adaptive designs: The second stage sample size decreases as the first stage responses go up. We theoretically prove this important property for the two proposed designs. The proposed designs can be easily applied to real trials with limited computing resources.

Citing Articles

Continuity corrected Wilson interval for the difference of two independent proportions.

Shan G, Lou X, Wu S J Stat Theory Appl. 2023; 22(1-2):38-53.

PMID: 37982044 PMC: 10655805. DOI: 10.1007/s44199-023-00054-8.

References
1.
Jin H, Wei Z . A new adaptive design based on Simon's two-stage optimal design for phase II clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012; 33(6):1255-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.07.003. View

2.
Simon R . Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1989; 10(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90015-9. View

3.
Chen Y, DeMets D, Lan K . Increasing the sample size when the unblinded interim result is promising. Stat Med. 2004; 23(7):1023-38. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1688. View

4.
Chen Y, Li C, Lan K . Sample size adjustment based on promising interim results and its application in confirmatory clinical trials. Clin Trials. 2015; 12(6):584-95. DOI: 10.1177/1740774515594378. View

5.
Shan G, Wilding G, Hutson A, Gerstenberger S . Optimal adaptive two-stage designs for early phase II clinical trials. Stat Med. 2015; 35(8):1257-66. PMC: 4777673. DOI: 10.1002/sim.6794. View