» Articles » PMID: 36994094

Nerve-spring Technique Could Achieve a Functional Trifecta Outcome of Robotic Intracorporeal Studer's Orthotopic Neobladder in the Male

Overview
Date 2023 Mar 30
PMID 36994094
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To summarize some key steps of functional improvement in robotic intracorporeal studer's orthotopic neobladder (RISON) of males, especially for nerve-spring technique. We also presented the result of 1-year follow-up aimed to illustrate its functional trifecta outcomes.

Methods: Robotic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal studer's orthotopic neobladder was performed on 33 male patients by the same surgeon from April 2018 to March 2019. Nerve-sparing technique had been used in 11 of the 33 patients. A prospectively maintained dataset was retrospectively searched and the related perioperative and follow-up data were analyzed. The functional trifecta outcomes referred to the freedom from recurrence, urinary continence and sexual function recovery after one year.

Results: A total of 33 males were included in our study. All perioperative information was recorded in detail. Thirty-two cases were confirmed to have negative surgical margin, except one pT3a case. And another case of incidental prostate cancer was diagnosed pathologically. All patients (100%) were recurrence-free one year after the operation. Eleven patients underwent nerve-sparing surgeries, including inter-fascial techniques or intra-fascial techniques. All these patients attained daytime continence (0 pad) at 1 month. With the nighttime continence, nerve-sparing group (2, 2,1) used fewer pads than other 22 cases (3, 3,2) at 1, 6 or 12 month(s) respectively. We defined urinary continence as 0 pad in daytime and no more than 1 pad in nighttime. The median preoperative score of International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-6) in the 11 cases was 24. The sexual function recovery was defined as IIEF-6 > 20. The final trifecta rate was 54.5% and the median follow-up time lasted 17 months (range, 12 to 22 months).

Conclusions: RISON could be a safe and feasible choice of urinary diversion. Nerve sparing techniques might help the patients achieve a relatively higher functional trifecta rate.

Citing Articles

Sexual-Sparing Radical Cystectomy in the Robot-Assisted Era: A Review on Functional and Oncological Outcomes.

Introini C, Sequi M, Ennas M, Benelli A, Guano G, Pastore A Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(1.

PMID: 39796736 PMC: 11720003. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17010110.


Long-term Outcomes of Prostate Capsule-Sparing and Nerve-Sparing Radical Cystectomy With Neobladder: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison.

Zhu Z, Zhu Y, Shi H, Zhou P, Xue Y, Hu S Int Neurourol J. 2025; 28(4):270-277.

PMID: 39765339 PMC: 11710957. DOI: 10.5213/inj.2448348.174.


Clinical efficacy and safety of organ-sparing cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhang Y, Peng L, Zhang Y, Li H, Li S, Zhang S PeerJ. 2024; 12:e18427.

PMID: 39677963 PMC: 11639212. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18427.


Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with Modified Vesica Ileale Padovana (VIP) Neobladder Configuration Using a Hybrid Approach: Initial Experience.

Shimizu F, Muto S, Kitamura K, China T, Shirakawa T, Kimura T J Pers Med. 2023; 13(5).

PMID: 37240972 PMC: 10222875. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13050802.

References
1.
Spiess P, Agarwal N, Bangs R, Boorjian S, Buyyounouski M, Clark P . Bladder Cancer, Version 5.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017; 15(10):1240-1267. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0156. View

2.
Asimakopoulos A, Campagna A, Gakis G, Corona Montes V, Piechaud T, Hoepffner J . Nerve Sparing, Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Bladder Substitution in the Male. J Urol. 2016; 196(5):1549-1557. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.04.114. View

3.
Walz J, Epstein J, Ganzer R, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Kaouk J . A Critical Analysis of the Current Knowledge of Surgical Anatomy of the Prostate Related to Optimisation of Cancer Control and Preservation of Continence and Erection in Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy: An Update. Eur Urol. 2016; 70(2):301-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.026. View

4.
Hernandez V, Linares Espinos E, Dunn J, MacLennan S, Lam T, Yuan Y . Oncological and functional outcomes of sexual function-preserving cystectomy compared with standard radical cystectomy in men: A systematic review. Urol Oncol. 2017; 35(9):539.e17-539.e29. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.04.013. View

5.
Weng H, Zeng X, Li S, Meng X, Shi M, He D . Intrafascial versus interfascial nerve sparing in radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):11454. PMC: 5597634. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-11878-7. View