» Articles » PMID: 36992717

The Path to Good Health: Shifting the Dialogue and Promoting Social Ecological Thinking

Overview
Date 2023 Mar 30
PMID 36992717
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of our research was to assess whether an intervention could produce changes in critical consciousness (CC) relative to participants' understanding of social influences on health and individual health behaviors. The intervention was a 4-min animation, entitled The Path to Good Health , that described how factors in our social environment influence individuals in a variety of ways and thereby our health. We used the same sampling and intervention strategies with two discrete cohorts of participants (Initial study: June 2018,  = 249; Retest study: October 2019,  = 315), who were recruited and incentivized through Amazon's Mechanical Turk platform. We measured direction and extent of change from pre-to post-intervention in four key constructs of CC (Passive Adaptation, Emotional Engagement, Cognitive Awakening, and Intentions to Act) using the 4-Factor Critical Consciousness Scale (4-FCCS), and we investigated differential effects of the intervention related to demographics of participants, including political typology. We also assessed concurrent and predictive validity of the (4-FCCS). Changes of CC subscale scores from pretest to posttest moved in the expected direction in both the Initial and Retest studies; Cohen's effect sizes were medium to very large in both studies. Overall, findings suggest the video intervention was effective at improving CC among participants drawn from the general population. We demonstrated that it is possible to influence people's cognitive-emotional interpretations in as little as 4 min, regardless of one's political ideology, and that the (4-FCCS) is sufficiently sensitive to measure changes in CC. This study provides preliminary evidence that a brief intervention can broaden cognitive-emotional interpretations from an over-emphasis on personal responsibility for individual health to an appreciation of the impact of social ecological factors on population health.

Citing Articles

Key factors in supporting adolescents to achieve high self-esteem and a positive body image: A qualitative community-based study.

Artigues-Barbera E, Tort-Nasarre G, Pollina-Pocallet M, Ferrer Suquet Y, Ayats Palles A, Guasch Niubo O PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0318989.

PMID: 39999141 PMC: 11856398. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318989.


Challenges and strategies for navigating Australian healthcare access: experience from Chinese international students.

Men Q, Li W, Khan A, Gillies R Int J Equity Health. 2024; 23(1):189.

PMID: 39300503 PMC: 11411794. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-024-02273-6.


Ecological care in nursing practice: a Walker and Avant concept analysis.

Moghbeli G, Soheili A, Ghafourifard M, Shahbazi S, Karkan H BMC Nurs. 2024; 23(1):614.

PMID: 39218885 PMC: 11367927. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-02279-z.

References
1.
Jost J, Federico C, Napier J . Political ideology: its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008; 60:307-37. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600. View

2.
Braveman P, Egerter S, Williams D . The social determinants of health: coming of age. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010; 32:381-98. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-101218. View

3.
Lundell H, Niederdeppe J, Clarke C . Public views about health causation, attributions of responsibility, and inequality. J Health Commun. 2013; 18(9):1116-30. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2013.768724. View

4.
Minkler M . Personal responsibility for health? A review of the arguments and the evidence at century's end. Health Educ Behav. 1999; 26(1):121-40. DOI: 10.1177/109019819902600110. View

5.
McLeroy K, BIBEAU D, Steckler A, Glanz K . An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. 1988; 15(4):351-77. DOI: 10.1177/109019818801500401. View