» Articles » PMID: 36989284

Evolutionary Game Theory and Simulations Based on Doctor and Patient Medical Malpractice

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2023 Mar 29
PMID 36989284
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Doctors and patients are the two critical players in medical malpractice. The evolutionary game model of doctors and patients is constructed based on information asymmetry and bounded rationality. The strategy selection problem of the two players in the medical malpractice process was studied. With change in different parameters, the evolutionary equilibrium strategy of the model was demonstrated using Vensim simulation. The results show that the weight, penalty amount, benefits of standardized practices, and patient medical alarm cost of strategies of different doctors are the key factors affecting doctor-patient evolutionary game system. Medical malpractice can be reduced by adjusting the weight of different strategy choices, increasing the penalties for illegal practices, and standardizing medical malpractice costs based on doctors' standardized practice income. Measures to effectively resolve medical malpractice are proposed by introducing a third-party normative system, establishing a doctor-patient information management system, and improving doctors' reward and punishment mechanisms.

Citing Articles

Evolutionary game theory and simulations based on doctor and patient medical malpractice under government regulation.

Song L, Yu Z, Fang J, He Q Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):18234.

PMID: 37880335 PMC: 10600196. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-44915-9.

References
1.
Aziz V . Cultural aspects of the patient-doctor relationship. Int Psychogeriatr. 2008; 21(2):415-7. DOI: 10.1017/S1041610208008119. View

2.
Tarrant C, Dixon-Woods M, Colman A, Stokes T . Continuity and trust in primary care: a qualitative study informed by game theory. Ann Fam Med. 2010; 8(5):440-6. PMC: 2939420. DOI: 10.1370/afm.1160. View

3.
Schneider U, Ulrich V . The physician-patient relationship revisited: the patient's view. Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2008; 8(4):279-300. DOI: 10.1007/s10754-008-9041-3. View

4.
Colman A . Cooperation, psychological game theory, and limitations of rationality in social interaction. Behav Brain Sci. 2003; 26(2):139-53. DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x03000050. View

5.
Zhou K, Ren T . Low-carbon technology collaborative innovation in industrial cluster with social exclusion: An evolutionary game theory perspective. Chaos. 2021; 31(3):033124. DOI: 10.1063/5.0037956. View