» Articles » PMID: 36983733

Clinical Characteristics of Minimal Lumbar Disc Herniation and Efficacy of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Via Transforaminal Approach: A Retrospective Study

Overview
Journal J Pers Med
Date 2023 Mar 29
PMID 36983733
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To define the characteristics of Mini LDH, develop new diagnostic references and examine the clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy via a transforaminal approach (TF-PELD) for it.

Methods: A total of 72 patients who underwent TF-PELD with Mini LDH from September 2019 to October 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The patients' basic information, symptoms, number of outpatient visits, duration of conservative treatment, physical examination findings and so on were obtained from the medical records. Clinical effects of TF-PELD for Mini LDH were assessed by means of the following: the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for low back pain (LBP) and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for functional status assessment and Modified Mac Nab criteria for patient satisfaction.

Results: Mini LDH have specific clinical characteristics and imaging features. All included patients achieved obvious pain relief after TF-PELD surgery. Pain scores were repeated at postoperative day 1 and 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months later. Results were statistically analyzed. The average VAS-Back, VAS-Leg and ODI scores were all significantly reduced at the first postoperative day and gradually decreased with the follow-up time continuing. In total, 66 out of 72 patients received an excellent or good recovery and no poor result was reported according to the Modified Mac Nab criteria.

Conclusions: Mini LDH is a type of LDH with special characteristics and in need of correct diagnosis and active treatment in clinical work. TF-PELD was also found to be an effective procedure for the treatment of Mini LDH.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation in Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Clinical Study.

Huang X, Liu X, Zhu B, Hou X, Hai B, Li S Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(11).

PMID: 38002421 PMC: 10669401. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10111297.

References
1.
Ru N, Su C, Li J, Li Y, Chen F, Wang G . Varied Low Back Pain Induced by Different Spinal Tissues in Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Retrospective Study. Pain Physician. 2022; 25(2):E331-E339. View

2.
Amin R, Andrade N, Neuman B . Lumbar Disc Herniation. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017; 10(4):507-516. PMC: 5685963. DOI: 10.1007/s12178-017-9441-4. View

3.
Choi K, Shim H, Hwang J, Shin S, Lee D, Jung H . Comparison of Surgical Invasiveness Between Microdiscectomy and 3 Different Endoscopic Discectomy Techniques for Lumbar Disc Herniation. World Neurosurg. 2018; 116:e750-e758. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.085. View

4.
Yang J, Chu L, Chen C, Wang X, Xie P, Deng R . Foraminoplasty at the Tip or Base of the Superior Articular Process for Lateral Recess Stenosis in Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Multicenter, Retrospective, Controlled Study with 2-Year Follow-Up. Biomed Res Int. 2019; 2018:7692794. PMC: 6313963. DOI: 10.1155/2018/7692794. View

5.
Liu X, Yuan S, Tian Y, Wang L, Gong L, Zheng Y . Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy, microendoscopic discectomy, and microdiscectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: minimum 2-year follow-up results. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018; 28(3):317-325. DOI: 10.3171/2017.6.SPINE172. View