Psychometric Properties and Validation of the Italian Version of Ages & Stages Questionnaires Third Edition

Overview

Journal Int J Environ Res Public Health

Publisher MDPI

Specialties Environmental Health
Public Health

Date 2023 Mar 29

PMID 36981921

Authors

Filippo Manti

Federica Giovannone

Matteo Ciancaleoni

Gloria De Vita

Francesca Fioriello

Federica Gigliotti

Carla Sogos

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

: The Ages & Stages Questionnaires Third Version (ASQ-3) identifies the risk of developmental delay in children aged 1 to 66 months. The aim of this study was to determine a reliable and valid instrument for the Italian population to enable the screening of children's development. : Data from 2278 Italian children (age range: 1-66 months) were used to evaluate item discrimination power using the corrected item-total correlation. Internal consistency was analyzed by Cronbach's alpha scores and a Confirmative Factor Analysis was conducted to test the factor structure of the test. Data were also collected to examine the ASQ-3 test-retest reliability and concurrent validity, which was investigated using the Griffiths Scales of Child Development, Third Edition, the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale, Second Edition, and the Developmental Profile, Third Edition tools. In order to evaluate discriminant validity, differences between typical development children and several clinical groups have been performed. Finally, two different cut-off scores have been proposed. : The results showed that the questionnaires are composed of high-quality items; the original factor structure has been confirmed and strong Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients between the overall and the total for each domain (ranging from 0.73 to 0.88). The Italian version of the ASQ-3 had adequate internal consistency and a strong agreement between observations with two weeks' intervals. Moreover, the test showed a high discriminant validity due to the possibility of fully discriminating between typical development children and several clinical groups. Finally, two different cut-off scores have been identified using ROC curves in order to have a screening and a diagnostic cut-off value. : This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Italian adaptation of ASQ-3 questionnaires. We demonstrated the validity of the ASQ-3 and determined new cut-off scores for Italian children. Early identification and accurate assessment are important starting points to better understand and anticipate the needs of children and their link to services.

Citing Articles

Association between Dietary Patterns during Pregnancy and Children's Neurodevelopment: A Birth Cohort Study.

Ouyang J, Cai W, Wu P, Tong J, Gao G, Yan S Nutrients. 2024; 16(10).

PMID: 38794768 PMC: 11123670. DOI: 10.3390/nu16101530.

Maternal Mental Health in Pregnancy and Its Impact on Children's Cognitive Development at 18 Months, during the COVID-19 Pandemic (CONCEPTION Study).

Ait Belkacem N, Gorgui J, Tchuente V, Aubin D, Lippe S, Berard A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(4).

PMID: 38398369 PMC: 10889100. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13041055.

References

Vameghi R, Sajedi F, Kraskian Mojembari A, Habiollahi A, Lornezhad H, Delavar B . Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validation and Standardization of Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) in Iranian Children. Iran J Public Health. 2013; 42(5):522-8. PMC: 3684462. View

Rosenberg S, Zhang D, Robinson C . Prevalence of developmental delays and participation in early intervention services for young children. Pediatrics. 2008; 121(6):e1503-9. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2007-1680. View

Bellman M, Byrne O, Sege R . Developmental assessment of children. BMJ. 2013; 346:e8687. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e8687. View

Colbert A, Connery A, Lamb M, Bauer D, Olson D, Paniagua-Avila A . Caregiver rating of early childhood development: Reliability and validity of the ASQ-3 in rural Guatemala. Early Hum Dev. 2021; 161:105453. DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2021.105453. View

Charafeddine L, Dani A, Badr L, Sinno D, Tamim H, Khoury J . The psychometric properties of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires-3 in Arabic: Cross-sectional observational study. Early Hum Dev. 2019; 136:33-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2019.06.010. View

Malak R, Fechner B, Stankowska M, Wiechec K, Szczapa T, Kasperkowicz J . The Importance of Monitoring Neurodevelopmental Outcomes for Preterm Infants: A Comparison of the AIMS, GMA, Pull to Sit Maneuver and ASQ-3. J Clin Med. 2022; 11(21). PMC: 9657223. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216295. View

Flora D, Curran P . An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychol Methods. 2004; 9(4):466-91. PMC: 3153362. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466. View

Filgueiras A, Pires P, Maissonette S, Landeira-Fernandez J . Psychometric properties of the Brazilian-adapted version of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire in public child daycare centers. Early Hum Dev. 2013; 89(8):561-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.02.005. View

Catino E, Di Trani M, Giovannone F, Manti F, Nunziata L, Piccari F . Screening for Developmental Disorders in 3- and 4-Year-Old Italian Children: A Preliminary Study. Front Pediatr. 2017; 5:181. PMC: 5581879. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2017.00181. View

10.

Chong K, Zhou V, Tarazona D, Tuesta H, Velasquez-Hurtado J, Sadeghi R . ASQ-3 scores are sensitive to small differences in age in a Peruvian infant population. Child Care Health Dev. 2017; 43(4):556-565. DOI: 10.1111/cch.12469. View

11.

Bentler P . Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990; 107(2):238-46. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238. View

12.

Vitrikas K, Savard D, Bucaj M . Developmental Delay: When and How to Screen. Am Fam Physician. 2017; 96(1):36-43. View

13.

Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Knudsen A, Brenner H . Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. Epidemiol Rev. 2011; 33:88-100. PMC: 3132805. DOI: 10.1093/epirev/mxr004. View

14.

. Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: an algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics. 2006; 118(1):405-20. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2006-1231. View

15.

Schonhaut B L, Perez R M, Castilla F A, Castro M S, Salinas A P, Armijo R I . [Predictive value of Ages & Stages Questionnaires for cognitive performance at early years of schooling]. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2017; 88(1):28-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.rchipe.2016.08.008. View

16.

Nozadi S, Li L, Clifford J, Du R, Murphy K, Chen L . Use of Ages and Stages Questionnaires™ (ASQ) in a Navajo population: Comparison with the U.S. normative dataset. Child Care Health Dev. 2019; 45(5):709-718. PMC: 6894904. DOI: 10.1111/cch.12704. View

17.

van Heerden A, Hsiao C, Matafwali B, Louw J, Richter L . Support for the feasibility of the ages and stages questionnaire as a developmental screening tool: a cross-sectional study of South African and Zambian children aged 2-60 months. BMC Pediatr. 2017; 17(1):55. PMC: 5312428. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-017-0802-3. View

18.

Agarwal P, Xie H, Sathyapalan Rema A, Rajadurai V, Lim S, Meaney M . Evaluation of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ 3) as a developmental screener at 9, 18, and 24 months. Early Hum Dev. 2020; 147:105081. DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105081. View

19.

Richter J, Janson H . A validation study of the Norwegian version of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires. Acta Paediatr. 2007; 96(5):748-52. DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00246.x. View

20.

Sheldrick R, Merchant S, Perrin E . Identification of developmental-behavioral problems in primary care: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2011; 128(2):356-63. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-3261. View