» Articles » PMID: 36981661

Reasons Behind the Delayed Diagnosis of Testicular Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Mar 29
PMID 36981661
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of the present study was to identify the reasons behind the delayed diagnosis of testicular cancer in a group of Polish males diagnosed with this malignancy in 2015-2016. The study included data from 72 patients aged between 18 and 69 years. Based on the median time elapsed to the testicular cancer diagnosis, the study patients were divided into the timely diagnosis group (diagnosis within 10 weeks from initial manifestation, = 40) and the delayed diagnosis group (diagnosis > 10 weeks from initial manifestation, = 32). Diagnosis of testicular cancer > 10 weeks after its initial manifestation was associated with less favorable survival (5-year overall survival: 78.1% [95% CI: 59.5-88.9%] vs. 92.5% [95% CI: 78.5-97.5%], = 0.087). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified two independent predictors of the delayed diagnosis, age > 33 years (OR = 6.65, = 0.020) and residence in the countryside (OR = 7.21, = 0.012), with another two parameters, the lack of a regular intimate partner (OR = 3.32, = 0.098) and the feeling of shame (OR = 8.13, = 0.056), being at the verge of statistical significance. All the factors mentioned above should be considered during planning social campaigns aimed at the early detection of testicular malignancies, along with improving the quality and trustfulness of Internet-based information resources.

Citing Articles

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Histopathological Cancer Diagnostics in Lower Silesia: A Comparative Analysis of Prostate, Breast, and Colorectal Cancer from 2018 to 2022.

Szkudlarek D, Kalinowska K, Wiatrak B Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(1.

PMID: 39796761 PMC: 11720222. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17010134.


Sonoelastography for Testicular Tumor Identification: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.

Lai D, Cheng E, Mao Y, Zheng Y, Yao K, Ni M Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(15).

PMID: 37568585 PMC: 10417060. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153770.

References
1.
Valizadeh-Haghi S, Rahmatizadeh S, Soleimaninejad A, Mousavi Shirazi S, Mollaei P . Are health websites credible enough for elderly self-education in the most prevalent elderly diseases?. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021; 21(1):31. PMC: 7842013. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01397-x. View

2.
Buja A, Lago L, Lago S, Vinelli A, Zanardo C, Baldo V . Marital status and stage of cancer at diagnosis: A systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017; 27(1). DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12755. View

3.
Williams F, Thompson E . Disparity in Breast Cancer Late Stage at Diagnosis in Missouri: Does Rural Versus Urban Residence Matter?. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2016; 3(2):233-9. PMC: 6314175. DOI: 10.1007/s40615-015-0132-9. View

4.
Yeo S, Eigl B, Ingledew P . A fountain of knowledge? The quality of online resources for testicular cancer patients. Can Urol Assoc J. 2020; 14(8):E363-E368. PMC: 7402687. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6154. View

5.
El-Haddad B, Dong F, Kallail K, Hines R, Ablah E . Association of marital status and colorectal cancer screening participation in the USA. Colorectal Dis. 2015; 17(5):O108-14. DOI: 10.1111/codi.12926. View