» Articles » PMID: 36980645

Improving the Assessment and Diagnosis of Breast Lymphedema After Treatment for Breast Cancer

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Mar 29
PMID 36980645
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Lymphedema can develop after treatment for breast cancer (BCRL). Lymphedema of the breast is not well studied. Currently, the main techniques used to diagnose and monitor the effectiveness of treatment are subjective clinician assessment and patient reports. Eighty-nine women who had undergone breast cancer treatment were recruited with and without breast lymphedema. Blinded clinical assessment determined the presence or absence of breast lymphedema. Measurement of skin thickness by ultrasound scanning, local tissue water by tissue dielectric constant (TDC) and tissue indentation by tonometry was recorded. Breast cancer treatment and demographic details were documented. Descriptive statistics were undertaken to compare sample characteristics, including the Chi-squared test, Odds Ratio (OR) and Relative Risks (RR) calculated. Increased body mass index (BMI), larger bra size, increased number of positive lymph nodes, axillary surgery, chemotherapy and increased Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) were all associated with breast lymphedema ( < 0.05). Ultrasound and TDC measurements were significantly higher in the lymphedema group ( < 0.05). Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curves demonstrated that ultrasound and TDC measurements could distinguish between edematous and non-edematous breasts. Threshold levels were produced, which demonstrated good levels of sensitivity and specificity. These findings have the potential to improve the diagnosis of breast lymphedema.

Citing Articles

Lymphedema after regional nodal irradiation for breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Park J, Kim Y, Kim H, Choi Y Ann Surg Treat Res. 2024; 106(6):337-343.

PMID: 38868589 PMC: 11164658. DOI: 10.4174/astr.2024.106.6.337.


Breast lymphedema following breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer: current status and future directions.

Brunelle C, Boyages J, Jung A, Suami H, Juhel B, Heydon-White A Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023; 204(2):193-222.

PMID: 38100015 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07161-1.

References
1.
Nuutinen J, Lahtinen T, Turunen M, Alanen E, Tenhunen M, Usenius T . A dielectric method for measuring early and late reactions in irradiated human skin. Radiother Oncol. 1998; 47(3):249-54. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(97)00234-x. View

2.
Brown N, Scurr J . "Breasts are getting bigger". Where is the evidence?. J Anthropol Sci. 2015; 94:237-44. DOI: 10.4436/JASS.94020. View

3.
Back M, Guerrieri M, Wratten C, Steigler A . Impact of radiation therapy on acute toxicity in breast conservation therapy for early breast cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2004; 16(1):12-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2003.08.005. View

4.
Liljegren G, Holmberg L, Westman G . The cosmetic outcome in early breast cancer treated with sector resection with or without radiotherapy. Uppsala-Orebro Breast Cancer Study Group. Eur J Cancer. 1993; 29A(15):2083-9. DOI: 10.1016/0959-8049(93)90038-h. View

5.
Marmot M, Altman D, Cameron D, Dewar J, Thompson S, Wilcox M . The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Br J Cancer. 2013; 108(11):2205-40. PMC: 3693450. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.177. View