» Articles » PMID: 36978295

Impact of Nucleic Acid Amplification Test on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Infection

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2023 Mar 29
PMID 36978295
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) is recommended to determine whether or not patients have a infection (CDI) when the glutamate dehydrogenase activity assay is positive and the rapid membrane enzyme immunoassays for toxins is negative. In our hospital, a NAAT was introduced to diagnose CDI precisely in April 2020. This study aimed to investigate the impact of a NAAT on the clinical outcomes in patients with CDI at our hospital. Seventy-one patients diagnosed with CDI between April 2017 and March 2022 were included in our study. Patients with CDI were divided into two groups: before (pre-NAAT) and after (post-NAAT) the introduction of NAAT. The clinical outcome was compared between the two groups. Of the 71 patients with CDI, 41 were sorted into the pre-NAAT group and 30 into the post-NAAT group. The clinical cure rate was significantly higher in the post-NAAT group compared to the pre-NAAT group (76.7% vs. 48.8%, = 0.018). In the multivariable analysis, the clinical cure was significantly associated with the introduction of NAAT ( = 0.022). Our findings suggest that the introduction of NAAT can improve the clinical outcomes in CDI patients.

Citing Articles

Emerging Diagnostics in Infection.

Hulme J Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(16).

PMID: 39201359 PMC: 11354687. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25168672.

References
1.
Windsor J, Kaplan G . Evolving Epidemiology of IBD. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2019; 21(8):40. DOI: 10.1007/s11894-019-0705-6. View

2.
Guinta M, Bunnell K, Harrington A, Bleasdale S, Danziger L, Wenzler E . Clinical and economic impact of the introduction of a nucleic acid amplification assay for Clostridium difficile. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2017; 16(1):77. PMC: 5713042. DOI: 10.1186/s12941-017-0252-7. View

3.
Goldenberg S . Public reporting of Clostridium difficile and improvements in diagnostic tests. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011; 32(12):1231-2. DOI: 10.1086/663014. View

4.
Beaulieu C, Dionne L, Julien A, Longtin Y . Clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with Clostridium difficile infection diagnosed by PCR versus a three-step algorithm. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014; 20(10):1067-73. DOI: 10.1111/1469-0691.12676. View

5.
Fong K, Fatica C, Hall G, Procop G, Schindler S, Gordon S . Impact of PCR testing for Clostridium difficile on incident rates and potential on public reporting: is the playing field level?. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011; 32(9):932-3. DOI: 10.1086/661789. View