» Articles » PMID: 36977941

Significance of Paraspinal Muscle Quality in Risk Between Single and Multiple Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures

Overview
Journal Eur Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2023 Mar 28
PMID 36977941
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare paraspinal muscle quality between patients with single and multiple osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) and evaluate the role of the paraspinal muscles in OVFs.

Methods: A total of 262 consecutive patients with OVFs were retrospectively analyzed in two groups: those with single OVF (n = 173) and those with multiple OVFs (n = 89). The cross-sectional area (CSA) and fatty degeneration of the paraspinal muscles were calculated from axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at the level of the L4 upper endplate by manual tracing in ImageJ software. Pearson's correlation analysis was performed to analyze correlations of paraspinal muscle quality to multiple OVFs.

Results: FD in all the paraspinal muscles was significantly higher in the multiple OVF group than the single OVF group (all p < 0.005). The functional CSA (fCSA) of the paraspinal muscles was significantly lower in the multiple OVF group than the single OVF group (all Ps < 0.001), except for the erector spine (p = 0.304). The Pearson's correlation analysis showed significant positive inter-correlations for the fCSAs of all the paraspinal muscles and the occurrence of multiple OVFs.

Conclusions: The pure muscle volumes of the multifidus, psoas major, and quadratus lumborum were lower in patients with multiple OVFs than in those with a single OVF. Furthermore, the inter-correlation among all the paraspinal muscles indicate that the muscle-bone crosstalk profoundly existed in vertebral fracture cascade. Therefore, special attention to paraspinal muscle quality is needed to prevent progression to multiple OVFs.

Citing Articles

Biomechanical assessment of unilateral/bilateral lumbar spondylolysis with and without muscle weakness using finite element analysis.

Ding B, Imai K, Chen Z, Xiao L Heliyon. 2025; 11(4):e42647.

PMID: 40066055 PMC: 11891713. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42647.


A new 3D full-body scanner analyzing the sagittal and coronal balance of the adult spine: a preliminary prospective observational study.

Kang T, Jang S, Seo I, Choi M, Park Y, Lee Y Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2025; 167(1):22.

PMID: 39853437 PMC: 11761465. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-024-06411-5.


The Difference in Paraspinal Muscle Parameters and the Correlation with Health-Related Quality of Life among Healthy Individuals, Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis and Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Liu Y, Yuan L, Zeng Y, Ni J, Yan S J Pers Med. 2023; 13(10).

PMID: 37888049 PMC: 10608224. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13101438.

References
1.
Park Y, Kim H . Prevention and treatment of multiple osteoporotic compression fracture. Asian Spine J. 2014; 8(3):382-90. PMC: 4068861. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2014.8.3.382. View

2.
Compston J, McClung M, Leslie W . Osteoporosis. Lancet. 2019; 393(10169):364-376. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32112-3. View

3.
Ballane G, Cauley J, Luckey M, El-Hajj Fuleihan G . Worldwide prevalence and incidence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2017; 28(5):1531-1542. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-017-3909-3. View

4.
Kim H, Yang J, Chang D, Suk S, Suh S, Song K . Adult Spinal Deformity: Current Concepts and Decision-Making Strategies for Management. Asian Spine J. 2020; 14(6):886-897. PMC: 7788366. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2020.0568. View

5.
Jang H, Kim E, Lee J, Choi S, Kim K, Shin B . Current Concepts in the Management of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: A Narrative Review. Asian Spine J. 2020; 14(6):898-909. PMC: 7788360. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2020.0594. View