Using the Experience Sampling Method to Support Clinical Practice: An Illustration with Problematic Cannabis Use

Overview

Journal Psychother Res

Publisher Routledge

Specialties Pharmacology
Psychiatry
Psychology

Date 2023 Mar 28

PMID 36976153

Authors

Marilyn L Piccirillo

Matthew C Enkema

Katherine T Foster

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The experience sampling method (ESM) has been frequently used in clinical research; however, there is low translational uptake in clinical practice. This may be due to challenges with interpreting individual-level data at granular intervals. We provide an illustrative example of how ESM can be leveraged to generate personalized cognitive-behavioral strategies for problematic cannabis use. We conducted a descriptive case series analysis using ESM data from 30 individuals reporting on problematic cannabis use, craving, affect, and coping four times daily for 16-days (t = 64, T = 1,920). Analyzing ESM data using descriptive statistics and visualizations from individuals with similar clinical and demographic profiles supported a diverse array of personalized clinical insights and recommendations for each case. These recommendations included psychoeducation regarding affect- and boredom-regulation strategies, functional analyses of occasions during which cannabis was not used, and discussions on how cannabis use intersects with one's personal values. While many clinicians utilize measurement-based care, barriers have limited the incorporation of ESM towards personalized, data-informed approaches to treatment. We provide an illustrative example of how ESM data can be used to generate actionable treatment strategies for problematic cannabis use and highlight continued challenges with interpreting time-series data.

Citing Articles

Leveraging Single-Case Experimental Designs to Promote Personalized Psychological Treatment: Step-by-Step Implementation Protocol with Stakeholder Involvement of an Outpatient Clinic for Personalized Psychotherapy.

Scholten S, Schemer L, Herzog P, Haas J, Heider J, Winter D Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024; 51(5):702-724.

PMID: 38467950 PMC: 11379774. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-024-01363-5.

Examining Associations Between Negative Affect and Substance Use in Treatment-Seeking Samples: A Review of Studies Using Intensive Longitudinal Methods.

Votaw V, Tuchman F, Piccirillo M, Schwebel F, Witkiewitz K Curr Addict Rep. 2023; 9(4):445-472.

PMID: 37063461 PMC: 10101148. DOI: 10.1007/s40429-022-00441-8.

References

Carver C . You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med. 1997; 4(1):92-100. DOI: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6. View

Flannery B, Volpicelli J, Pettinati H . Psychometric properties of the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1999; 23(8):1289-95. View

Dotterer H, Beltz A, Foster K, Simms L, Wright A . Personalized models of personality disorders: using a temporal network method to understand symptomatology and daily functioning in a clinical sample. Psychol Med. 2019; 50(14):2397-2405. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291719002563. View

Wycoff A, Metrik J, Trull T . Affect and cannabis use in daily life: a review and recommendations for future research. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018; 191:223-233. PMC: 6201696. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.07.001. View

WATSON D, Clark L, Tellegen A . Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988; 54(6):1063-70. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063. View

Reeves J, Fisher A . An Examination of Idiographic Networks of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms. J Trauma Stress. 2020; 33(1):84-95. DOI: 10.1002/jts.22491. View

Frumkin M, Piccirillo M, Beck E, Grossman J, Rodebaugh T . Feasibility and utility of idiographic models in the clinic: A pilot study. Psychother Res. 2020; 31(4):520-534. PMC: 7902742. DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2020.1805133. View

Krageloh C, Czuba K, Billington D, Kersten P, Siegert R . Using feedback from patient-reported outcome measures in mental health services: a scoping study and typology. Psychiatr Serv. 2015; 66(3):224-41. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400141. View

Loflin M, Kiluk B, Huestis M, Aklin W, Budney A, Carroll K . The state of clinical outcome assessments for cannabis use disorder clinical trials: A review and research agenda. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020; 212:107993. PMC: 7293929. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107993. View

10.

Piot M, Mestdagh M, Riese H, Weermeijer J, Brouwer J, Kuppens P . Practitioner and researcher perspectives on the utility of ecological momentary assessment in mental health care: A survey study. Internet Interv. 2022; 30:100575. PMC: 9526140. DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100575. View

11.

Ellison W . An Initial Study of Practicing Psychologists' Views of the Utility of Ecological Momentary Assessment for Difficult Psychotherapy Cases. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2020; 48(4):597-607. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-020-01093-4. View

12.

Foster K, Beltz A . Advancing statistical analysis of ambulatory assessment data in the study of addictive behavior: A primer on three person-oriented techniques. Addict Behav. 2018; 83:25-34. PMC: 7460806. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.12.018. View

13.

Serre F, Fatseas M, Swendsen J, Auriacombe M . Ecological momentary assessment in the investigation of craving and substance use in daily life: a systematic review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015; 148:1-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.12.024. View

14.

Bringmann L, van der Veen D, Wichers M, Riese H, Stulp G . ESMvis: a tool for visualizing individual Experience Sampling Method (ESM) data. Qual Life Res. 2020; 30(11):3179-3188. PMC: 8528801. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02701-4. View

15.

Frumkin M, Haroutounian S, Rodebaugh T . Examining emotional pain among individuals with chronic physical pain: Nomothetic and idiographic approaches. J Psychosom Res. 2020; 136:110172. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110172. View

16.

Schultz N, Bassett D, Messina B, Correia C . Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the cannabis use disorders identification test - revised among college students. Addict Behav. 2019; 95:11-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.02.016. View

17.

Piccirillo M, Rodebaugh T . Personalized networks of social anxiety disorder and depression and implications for treatment. J Affect Disord. 2021; 298(Pt A):262-276. PMC: 8690310. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.034. View

18.

Harding K, Rush A, Arbuckle M, Trivedi M, Pincus H . Measurement-based care in psychiatric practice: a policy framework for implementation. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011; 72(8):1136-43. DOI: 10.4088/JCP.10r06282whi. View

19.

Rollnick S, Heather N, Gold R, Hall W . Development of a short 'readiness to change' questionnaire for use in brief, opportunistic interventions among excessive drinkers. Br J Addict. 1992; 87(5):743-54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1992.tb02720.x. View

20.

Piccirillo M, Beck E, Rodebaugh T . . Behav Ther. 2019; 50(5):938-951. DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2019.02.002. View