» Articles » PMID: 36971103

Olaparib Efficacy in Patients with Germline BRCA-mutated, HER2-negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: Subgroup Analyses from the Phase III OlympiAD Trial

Overview
Journal Int J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Mar 27
PMID 36971103
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the primary analysis of the phase III OlympiAD trial, olaparib significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) vs chemotherapy treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients with germline BRCA-mutated (gBRCAm), HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). We report subgroup analyses for the final analysis at a median OS follow-up of 18.9 months (olaparib) and 15.5 months (TPC). Patients (N = 302) with gBRCAm, HER2-negative mBC and ≤2 previous lines of chemotherapy for mBC were randomized 2:1 to open-label olaparib (300 mg twice daily) or TPC. All subgroup analyses were prespecified except site of metastases. Investigator-assessed median PFS was 8.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.8-8.4; 176/205 events) for olaparib and 3.8 months (95% CI 2.8-4.2; 83/97 events) for TPC (hazard ratio 0.51, 95% CI 0.39-0.66). In subgroup analyses, median PFS hazard ratios (95% CI) favored olaparib: hormone receptor status (triple-negative: 0.47, 0.32-0.69; hormone receptor-positive: 0.52, 0.36-0.75); gBRCAm (BRCA1: 0.49, 0.35-0.71; BRCA2: 0.49, 0.33-0.74); site of metastases (visceral/CNS: 0.53, 0.40-0.71; non-visceral: 0.45, 0.23-0.98); prior chemotherapy for mBC (yes: 0.51, 0.38-0.70; no: 0.49, 0.30-0.82); prior platinum-based chemotherapy for BC (yes: 0.49, 0.30-0.83; no: 0.50, 0.37-0.69); progressive disease at randomization (yes: 0.48, 0.35-0.65; no: 0.61, 0.36-1.07). Investigator-assessed objective response rates were higher across all subgroups with olaparib (35-68%) vs TPC (5-40%). Global health status/health-related quality of life increased in all subgroups with olaparib vs decreased/no change with TPC. These data confirm the consistency of olaparib benefit across patient subgroups in OlympiAD.

Citing Articles

Tailored therapies for triple-negative breast cancer: current landscape and future perceptions.

Khan Y, Rizvi S, Raza A, Khan A, Hussain S, Khan N Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025; .

PMID: 40029385 DOI: 10.1007/s00210-025-03896-4.


Second-Line Treatment Options for Patients with Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Review of the Clinical Evidence.

Garcia-Saenz J, Rodriguez-Lescure A, Cruz J, Albanell J, Alba E, Llombart A Target Oncol. 2025; .

PMID: 39806129 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-024-01125-1.


Beyond Hormone Receptors: liquid biopsy tools to unveil new clinical meanings and empower therapeutic decision-making in Luminal-like metastatic breast cancer.

Pasto B, Vida R, Dri A, Foffano L, Della Rossa S, Gerratana L Breast. 2024; 79:103859.

PMID: 39708442 PMC: 11872398. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103859.


BRCA-mutated breast cancer: the unmet need, challenges and therapeutic benefits of genetic testing.

Arun B, Couch F, Abraham J, Tung N, Fasching P Br J Cancer. 2024; 131(9):1400-1414.

PMID: 39215191 PMC: 11519381. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02827-z.


Susceptibility gene mutations in germline and tumors of patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.

Fasching P, Hu C, Hart S, Ruebner M, Polley E, Gnanaolivu R NPJ Breast Cancer. 2024; 10(1):57.

PMID: 39003306 PMC: 11246424. DOI: 10.1038/s41523-024-00667-x.