Contextualizing Cannabis Implicit Associations: Consideration of Peers and Personality

Overview

Journal Emerg Adulthood

Publisher Sage Publications

Date 2023 Mar 27

PMID 36970728

Authors

Nolan E Ramer

Craig R Colder

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: Implicit cannabis associations (ICAs) inconsistently predict cannabis use (CU), and little is known about their formation. Personality, behavioral approach and inhibition, were tested as predictors of ICAs, which in turn, was expected to predict CU (mediation). Peer context was tested as a moderator.

Method: Data were taken from three annual assessments of a larger longitudinal study. The community sample (314 emerging adults, mean age = 19.13, 54% female, 76% White/non-Hispanic at the first assessment) completed an ICA task and questionnaire assessments of CU, personality, and peer norms.

Results: ICAs were positively associated with CU at high but not low levels of perceived peer approval/use. Behavioral inhibition was negatively associated ICAs, which in turn, predicted infrequent CU at high levels of peer approval/use (moderated mediation). Behavioral approach was marginally associated with ICAs.

Conclusions: Peer context and personality are important for understanding the formation of ICAs and their association with CU.

References

Chen P, Jacobson K . Developmental trajectories of substance use from early adolescence to young adulthood: gender and racial/ethnic differences. J Adolesc Health. 2012; 50(2):154-63. PMC: 3264901. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.05.013. View

Houben K, Wiers R . Assessing implicit alcohol associations with the Implicit Association Test: fact or artifact?. Addict Behav. 2005; 31(8):1346-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.10.009. View

OConnor R, Lopez-Vergara H, Colder C . Implicit cognition and substance use: the role of controlled and automatic processes in children. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2011; 73(1):134-43. PMC: 3237704. DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2012.73.134. View

Neighbors C, Geisner I, Lee C . Perceived marijuana norms and social expectancies among entering college student marijuana users. Psychol Addict Behav. 2008; 22(3):433-8. DOI: 10.1037/0893-164X.22.3.433. View

Bertholet N, Faouzi M, Studer J, Daeppen J, Gmel G . Perception of tobacco, cannabis, and alcohol use of others is associated with one's own use. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2014; 8:15. PMC: 3853223. DOI: 10.1186/1940-0640-8-15. View

GREENWALD A, McGhee D, Schwartz J . Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998; 74(6):1464-80. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.6.1464. View

Papinczak Z, Connor J, Harnett P, Gullo M . A biosocial cognitive model of cannabis use in emerging adulthood. Addict Behav. 2017; 76:229-235. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.08.011. View

Colder C, Read J, Wieczorek W, Eiden R, Lengua L, Hawk Jr L . Cognitive appraisals of alcohol use in early adolescence: Psychosocial predictors and reciprocal associations with alcohol use. J Early Adolesc. 2017; 37(4):525-558. PMC: 5417541. DOI: 10.1177/0272431615611256. View

Kahn R, Chiu P, Deater-Deckard K, Hochgraf A, King-Casas B, Kim-Spoon J . The Interaction Between Punishment Sensitivity and Effortful Control for Emerging Adults' Substance Use Behaviors. Subst Use Misuse. 2018; 53(8):1299-1310. PMC: 6168062. DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1407790. View

10.

Simons J, Dvorak R, Lau-Barraco C . Behavioral inhibition and activation systems: differences in substance use expectancy organization and activation in memory. Psychol Addict Behav. 2009; 23(2):315-28. PMC: 2800948. DOI: 10.1037/a0015834. View

11.

Beraha E, Cousijn J, Hermanides E, Goudriaan A, Wiers R . Implicit Associations and Explicit Expectancies toward Cannabis in Heavy Cannabis Users and Controls. Front Psychiatry. 2013; 4:59. PMC: 3689035. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00059. View

12.

Bijttebier P, Beck I, Claes L, Vandereycken W . Gray's Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory as a framework for research on personality-psychopathology associations. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009; 29(5):421-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.04.002. View

13.

Schafer J, Graham J . Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods. 2002; 7(2):147-77. View

14.

Colder C, Hawk Jr L, Lengua L, Wiezcorek W, Eiden R, Read J . Trajectories of Reinforcement Sensitivity During Adolescence and Risk for Substance Use. J Res Adolesc. 2013; 23(2):345-356. PMC: 3680139. DOI: 10.1111/jora.12001. View

15.

Fergusson D, Horwood L, Ridder E . Tests of causal linkages between cannabis use and psychotic symptoms. Addiction. 2005; 100(3):354-66. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01001.x. View

16.

Connor J, Gullo M, Feeney G, Young R . Validation of the Cannabis Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) in adult cannabis users in treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010; 115(3):167-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.10.025. View

17.

Arbour-Nicitopoulos K, Kwan M, Lowe D, Taman S, Faulkner G . Social norms of alcohol, smoking, and marijuana use within a Canadian university setting. J Am Coll Health. 2010; 59(3):191-6. DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2010.502194. View

18.

Cerda M, Moffitt T, Meier M, Harrington H, Houts R, Ramrakha S . Persistent cannabis dependence and alcohol dependence represent risks for midlife economic and social problems: A longitudinal cohort study. Clin Psychol Sci. 2016; 4(6):1028-1046. PMC: 5167539. DOI: 10.1177/2167702616630958. View

19.

Blum K, Braverman E, HOLDER J, LUBAR J, Monastra V, Miller D . Reward deficiency syndrome: a biogenetic model for the diagnosis and treatment of impulsive, addictive, and compulsive behaviors. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2001; 32 Suppl:i-iv, 1-112. DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2000.10736099. View

20.

Lopez-Vergara H, Colder C, Hawk Jr L, Wieczorek W, Eiden R, Lengua L . Reinforcement sensitivity theory and alcohol outcome expectancies in early adolescence. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2012; 38(2):130-4. PMC: 4033694. DOI: 10.3109/00952990.2011.643973. View