Stratification of Spine Patients Based on Self-reported Clinical Symptom Classes: Evaluation of Long-term Outcomes and Subsequent Interventions

Overview

Journal N Am Spine Soc J

Date 2023 Mar 27

PMID 36970061

Authors

Brittany Lapin

Sara Davin

Mary Stilphen

Joshua K Johnson

Edward Benzel

Ghaith Habboub

Irene L Katzan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Prior work by our group developed a stratification tool based on four PROMIS domains for patients with low back pain (LBP). Our study aimed to evaluate the ability of our previously developed symptom classes to predict long-term outcomes, and determine whether there were differential treatment effects by intervention.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with LBP seen in spine clinics in a large health system between November 14, 2018 and May 14, 2019 who completed patient-reported outcomes as part of routine care at baseline and again at 12-months follow-up. Latent class analysis identified symptom classes based on PROMIS domain scores (physical function, pain interference, social role satisfaction, and fatigue) that were ≥1 standard deviation worse (meaningfully worse) than the general population. The ability of the profiles to predict long-term outcomes at 12-months was evaluated through multivariable models. Differences in outcomes by subsequent treatments (physical therapy, specialist visits, injections, and surgery) were investigated.

Results: There were 3,236 adult patients (average age 61.1 ± 14.2, 55.4% female) included in the study with three distinct classes identified: mild symptoms ( = 986, 30.5%), mixed ( = 798, 24.7%) with poor scores on physical function and pain interference but better scores on other domains, and significant symptoms ( = 1,452, 44.9%). The classes were significantly associated with long-term outcomes, with patients with significant symptoms improving the most across all domains. Utilization differed across classes, with the mixed symptom class receiving more PT and injections and significant symptom class receiving more surgeries and specialist visits.

Conclusions: Patients with LBP have distinct clinical symptom classes which could be utilized to stratify patients into groups based on risk of future disability. These symptom classes can also be used to provide estimates of the effectiveness of different interventions, further increasing the clinical utility of these classes in standard care.

Citing Articles

Identifying latent subgroups in the older population seeking primary health care for a new episode of back pain - findings from the BACE-N cohort.

Grondahl L, Axen I, Stensrud S, Hoekstra T, Vigdal O, Killingmo R BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):60.

PMID: 38216905 PMC: 10787445. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07163-0.

References

Lapin B, Davin S, Stilphen M, Johnson J, Benzel E, Habboub G . Stratification of spine patients based on self-reported clinical symptom classes. Spine J. 2022; 22(7):1131-1138. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.02.008. View

Dutmer A, Schiphorst Preuper H, Stewart R, Soer R, Reneman M, Wolff A . Trajectories of Disability and Low Back Pain Impact: 2-year Follow-up of the Groningen Spine Cohort. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020; 45(23):1649-1660. PMC: 7647438. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003647. View

Dieleman J, Cao J, Chapin A, Chen C, Li Z, Liu A . US Health Care Spending by Payer and Health Condition, 1996-2016. JAMA. 2020; 323(9):863-884. PMC: 7054840. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.0734. View

Riddle D . Classification and low back pain: a review of the literature and critical analysis of selected systems. Phys Ther. 1998; 78(7):708-37. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/78.7.708. View

Allvin R, Fjordkvist E, Blomberg K . Struggling to be seen and understood as a person - Chronic back pain patients' experiences of encounters in health care: An interview study. Nurs Open. 2019; 6(3):1047-1054. PMC: 6650668. DOI: 10.1002/nop2.290. View

Hill J, Dunn K, Lewis M, Mullis R, Main C, Foster N . A primary care back pain screening tool: identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment. Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 59(5):632-41. DOI: 10.1002/art.23563. View

Bouter L, van Tulder M, Koes B . Methodologic issues in low back pain research in primary care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998; 23(18):2014-20. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199809150-00019. View

Pham T, DeVries A, Bailly E, Raina D . Cross-Sectional Trends in Potentially Low-Value Services for Commercially Insured Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain. JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(2):e2147178. PMC: 8822380. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.47178. View

Schwartz A, Zaslavsky A, Landon B, Chernew M, McWilliams J . Low-Value Service Use in Provider Organizations. Health Serv Res. 2016; 53(1):87-119. PMC: 5785325. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12597. View

10.

Sharma M, Ugiliweneza B, Beswick J, Boakye M . Concurrent Validity and Comparative Responsiveness of PROMIS-SF Versus Legacy Measures in the Cervical and Lumbar Spine Population: Longitudinal Analysis from Baseline to Postsurgery. World Neurosurg. 2018; 115:e664-e675. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.131. View

11.

Lapin B, Davin S, Stilphen M, Benzel E, Katzan I . Validation of PROMIS CATs and PROMIS Global Health in an Interdisciplinary Pain Program for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019; 45(4):E227-E235. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003232. View

12.

Dionne C, Bourbonnais R, Fremont P, Rossignol M, Stock S, Larocque I . A clinical return-to-work rule for patients with back pain. CMAJ. 2005; 172(12):1559-67. PMC: 558170. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1041159. View

13.

Abenhaim L, Rossignol M, Gobeille D, Bonvalot Y, Fines P, Scott S . The prognostic consequences in the making of the initial medical diagnosis of work-related back injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995; 20(7):791-5. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199504000-00010. View

14.

Kroenke K, Spitzer R, Williams J . The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001; 16(9):606-13. PMC: 1495268. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x. View

15.

. Implementing a Scientifically Valid, Cost-Effective, and Scalable Data Collection System at Point of Care: The Cleveland Clinic OME Cohort. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019; 101(5):458-464. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00767. View

16.

Hays R, Bjorner J, Revicki D, Spritzer K, Cella D . Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items. Qual Life Res. 2009; 18(7):873-80. PMC: 2724630. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-009-9496-9. View

17.

Freburger J, Holmes G, Agans R, Jackman A, Darter J, Wallace A . The rising prevalence of chronic low back pain. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169(3):251-8. PMC: 4339077. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.543. View

18.

Buchbinder R, Underwood M, Hartvigsen J, Maher C . The Lancet Series call to action to reduce low value care for low back pain: an update. Pain. 2020; 161 Suppl 1:S57-S64. PMC: 7434211. DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001869. View

19.

Fritz J, Brennan G, Clifford S, Hunter S, Thackeray A . An examination of the reliability of a classification algorithm for subgrouping patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(1):77-82. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000193898.14803.8a. View

20.

Hicks G, Fritz J, Delitto A, McGill S . Preliminary development of a clinical prediction rule for determining which patients with low back pain will respond to a stabilization exercise program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86(9):1753-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.033. View