The Positivity Bias of Chinese Temporal Collective Self: Evidence from the First-person Perspective and the Third-person Perspective

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2023 Mar 27

PMID 36968743

Authors

Caizhen Yue

Yihong Long

Chaomei Ni

Huating Wu

Dexuan Zhao

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: As a unique part of human thinking, people can project themselves into the past or the future for mental time travel. This study attempts to expand the temporal self into the domain of the collective self.

Methods: We used an adapted temporal collective self-reference paradigm to probe into the positivity bias of temporal collective self in this study. In Experiment 1, the first-person perspective was adopted for the participants to conduct the temporal collective self-reference processing, and the third-person perspective was adopted for the temporal collective self-reference processing in Experiment 2.

Results: The findings indicated that no matter from the first-person perspective or the third-person perspective, people show positivity bias in the trait adjectives judgment, response times and recognition rates during the temporal collective self-processing.

Discussion: This study explores mental time travel on the level of collective self, and contributes to deepening the understanding of temporal collective self.

Citing Articles

Valence-based biases in collective temporal thought: The role of question framing, culture, and age.

Yao Z, Multhaup K, Salter P Mem Cognit. 2025; .

PMID: 39808361 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-024-01680-y.

Self-processing characteristics from first-person and third-person perspectives in individuals with social anxiety disorder: insights into negative bias.

Wu H, Yue C, Cao F, Long Y, Wang Y Front Psychiatry. 2024; 14:1283624.

PMID: 38375515 PMC: 10875139. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1283624.

References

Gallo D, Korthauer L, McDonough I, Teshale S, Johnson E . Age-related positivity effects and autobiographical memory detail: evidence from a past/future source memory task. Memory. 2011; 19(6):641-52. PMC: 3623554. DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2011.595723. View

Caruso E . When the future feels worse than the past: a temporal inconsistency in moral judgment. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010; 139(4):610-24. DOI: 10.1037/a0020757. View

Tulving E . Episodic memory: from mind to brain. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001; 53:1-25. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114. View

Peetz J, Wohl M . Perceiving time through group-based glasses: Collective temporal orientation. Br J Soc Psychol. 2018; 58(3):609-629. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12291. View

Szpunar K, Addis D, Schacter D . Memory for emotional simulations: remembering a rosy future. Psychol Sci. 2011; 23(1):24-9. PMC: 3847671. DOI: 10.1177/0956797611422237. View

Peetz J, Gunn G, Wilson A . Crimes of the past: defensive temporal distancing in the face of past in-group wrongdoing. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010; 36(5):598-611. DOI: 10.1177/0146167210364850. View

Berntsen D, Bohn A . Remembering and forecasting: The relation between autobiographical memory and episodic future thinking. Mem Cognit. 2010; 38(3):265-78. DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.3.265. View

Zhu Y, Zhang L . An experimental study on the self-reference effect. Sci China C Life Sci. 2008; 45(2):120-8. DOI: 10.1360/02yc9014. View

Chen J, Yuan J, Feng T, Chen A, Gu B, Li H . Temporal features of the degree effect in self-relevance: neural correlates. Biol Psychol. 2011; 87(2):290-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.03.012. View

10.

Pronin E . How we see ourselves and how we see others. Science. 2008; 320(5880):1177-80. DOI: 10.1126/science.1154199. View

11.

Trope Y, Liberman N . Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychol Rev. 2010; 117(2):440-63. PMC: 3152826. DOI: 10.1037/a0018963. View

12.

DArgembeau A, Van der Linden M . Phenomenal characteristics associated with projecting oneself back into the past and forward into the future: influence of valence and temporal distance. Conscious Cogn. 2004; 13(4):844-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2004.07.007. View

13.

Hirst W, Yamashiro J, Coman A . Collective Memory from a Psychological Perspective. Trends Cogn Sci. 2018; 22(5):438-451. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.010. View

14.

Hershfield H . Future self-continuity: how conceptions of the future self transform intertemporal choice. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011; 1235:30-43. PMC: 3764505. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06201.x. View

15.

Fields E, Weber K, Stillerman B, Delaney-Busch N, Kuperberg G . Functional MRI reveals evidence of a self-positivity bias in the medial prefrontal cortex during the comprehension of social vignettes. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019; 14(6):613-621. PMC: 6688454. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsz035. View

16.

Anderson F, McDaniel M . Hey buddy, why don't we take it outside: An experience sampling study of prospective memory. Mem Cognit. 2018; 47(1):47-62. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-018-0849-x. View

17.

Zhou A, Li S, Herbert C, Xia R, Xu K, Xu Q . Perspective taking modulates positivity bias in self-appraisals: behavioral and event-related potential evidence. Soc Neurosci. 2013; 8(4):326-33. DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2013.807873. View

18.

Herbert C, Junghofer M, Kissler J . Event related potentials to emotional adjectives during reading. Psychophysiology. 2008; 45(3):487-98. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00638.x. View

19.

Yue C, Long Y, Ni C, Peng C, Yue T . Valence of Temporal Self-Appraisals: A Comparison Between First-Person Perspective and Third-Person Perspective. Front Psychol. 2021; 12:778532. PMC: 8631811. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.778532. View

20.

Sutin A, Robins R . When the "I" looks at the "Me": autobiographical memory, visual perspective, and the self. Conscious Cogn. 2008; 17(4):1386-97. PMC: 2733231. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.09.001. View