Social Determinants of Clinical Visits After Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

This study aims to investigate the social determinants of clinical visits after LM-PCI versus CABG and their impact on post-treatment care and outcomes. We identified all adult patients who underwent LM-PCI or CABG between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2022, and were in follow-up at our institute. We collected data on clinical visits, including outpatient visits, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations, in the years following the procedure. The study included 3816 patients, of which 1220 underwent LM-PCI and 2596 underwent CABG. The majority of patients were Punjabi (55.8%), males (71.8%), and had low socioeconomic status (69.2%). The strongest predictors of having a follow-up visit were age (OR (95%CI): 1.41 (0.87-2.35); P value = 0.03), female gender (OR (95%CI): 2.16 (1.58-4.21); P value = 0.07), LM-PCI (OR (95%CI): 2.32 (0.94-3.64); P-value = 0.01), government entitlement (OR (95%CI): 0.67 (0.15-0.84); P value = 0.16), high SYNTAX (OR (95%CI): 1.07 (0.83-2.58); P value = 0.02), 3-vessel disease (OR (95%CI): 1.76 (1.05-2.95); P value <0.01), and peripheral arterial disease (OR (95%CI): 1.52 (0.91-2.45); P value = 0.01). Hospitalizations, outpatient, and emergency visits were more in the LM-PCI cohort as compared to CABG. In conclusion, the social determinants of health, including ethnicity, employment, and socioeconomic status were associated with differences in clinical follow-up visits after LM-PCI and CABG.