» Articles » PMID: 36962421

"They Will Say You Want to Make Their Home Die": A Mixed Methods Study to Assess Modern Family Planning Use in Partnered South Sudanese Refugee and Host Populations in Northern Uganda

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2023 Mar 24
PMID 36962421
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The unmet need for family planning among conflict-affected populations is high globally, leaving girls and women vulnerable to unintended pregnancies and poor sexual and reproductive health outcomes. Ours is the first known mixed-methods study to assess the use of modern family planning (FP) methods amongst married or partnered South Sudanese refugee and host populations in Northern Uganda and to explore differences between them. We conducted a cross-sectional survey in July 2019 which included 1,533 partnered women of reproductive age (15-49 years) from host and South Sudanese refugee communities in Kiryandongo and Arua. Qualitative data were collected in October 2019-January 2020 via 34 focus group discussions and 129 key informant interviews with refugee and host populations, health workers, community and religious leaders, health workers, local authorities and humanitarian actors. Our study did not find large differences between South Sudanese refugee and host populations in regard to modern FP use, though refugees reported somewhat poorer FP knowledge, accessibility and utilisation compared to Ugandan women. Reported barriers to FP use relate to access, quality of services, health concerns and family/community opposition, all of which emphasise the importance of men's gendered roles in relationships, cultural and religious beliefs and lack of agency for most women to make their own decisions about reproductive health. Sexual and gender-based violence related to FP use was reported among both refugee and host populations. Additional barriers to FP use include lack of privacy at the public health facilities which reduces confidentiality, mistrust of health workers, and stockouts of FP commodities. Facilitating factors for FP use included: free government health services; the presence of well-trained health workers; and NGOs who give support to populations and conduct community outreaches. The findings of this study underscore the importance of developing and implementing tailored sexual and reproductive health information and services, especially for modern FP methods, in partnership with South Sudanese refugee and host populations in Northern Uganda.

Citing Articles

Decision-making pathways for contraceptive use among refugee and host populations in Adjumani district, Uganda; an exploratory study.

Achola R, Orach C, Nabiwemba E, Atuyambe L BMC Womens Health. 2024; 24(1):427.

PMID: 39061042 PMC: 11282639. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03272-z.


Scoping review of qualitative studies on family planning in Uganda.

Buser J, Pebolo P, August E, Rana G, Gray R, Jacobson-Davies F PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4(7):e0003313.

PMID: 38959214 PMC: 11221757. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003313.


Factors associated with family planning use among refugee and host populations in Adjumani district, West Nile, Uganda: a comparative study.

Achola R, Atuyambe L, Nabiwemba E, Fredrick M, Orach C BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):754.

PMID: 38468212 PMC: 10929096. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18103-x.


Modern contraceptive prevalence and its predictors among non-refugee and refugee Somali women in Nairobi city, Kenya; a comparative view.

Gitonga E, Gage A Front Glob Womens Health. 2024; 5:1328612.

PMID: 38313219 PMC: 10834660. DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1328612.


Sexual and reproductive healthcare utilisation and affordability for South Sudanese refugees and host populations in Northern Uganda: A mixed methods study.

Prabhakar P, Singh N, Sulaiman M, King J, Saddique Z, Mounier-Jack S PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023; 3(9):e0002351.

PMID: 37672542 PMC: 10482223. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002351.


References
1.
Bakesiima R, Cleeve A, Larsson E, Tumwine J, Ndeezi G, Gemzell Danielsson K . Modern contraceptive use among female refugee adolescents in northern Uganda: prevalence and associated factors. Reprod Health. 2020; 17(1):67. PMC: 7238518. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-020-00921-y. View

2.
Willcox M, Mubangizi V, Natukunda S, Owokuhaisa J, Nahabwe H, Nakaggwa F . Couples' decision-making on post-partum family planning and antenatal counselling in Uganda: A qualitative study. PLoS One. 2021; 16(5):e0251190. PMC: 8099118. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251190. View

3.
Atuyambe L, Kibira S, Bukenya J, Muhumuza C, Apolot R, Mulogo E . Understanding sexual and reproductive health needs of adolescents: evidence from a formative evaluation in Wakiso district, Uganda. Reprod Health. 2015; 12:35. PMC: 4416389. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-015-0026-7. View

4.
Ackerson K, Zielinski R . Factors influencing use of family planning in women living in crisis affected areas of Sub-Saharan Africa: A review of the literature. Midwifery. 2017; 54:35-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.07.021. View

5.
Ivanova O, Rai M, Mlahagwa W, Tumuhairwe J, Bakuli A, Nyakato V . A cross-sectional mixed-methods study of sexual and reproductive health knowledge, experiences and access to services among refugee adolescent girls in the Nakivale refugee settlement, Uganda. Reprod Health. 2019; 16(1):35. PMC: 6425697. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-019-0698-5. View