Characteristics and Expectations Among Emergency Department Patients in India

Overview

Journal PLOS Glob Public Health

Specialty Public Health

Date 2023 Mar 24

PMID 36962082

Authors

Kevin Davey

Sumin Jacob

Nilesh Prasad

Manjula Shri

Richard Amdur

Janice Blanchard

Jeffrey Smith

Katherine Douglass

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

In India, and many low-middle income countries (LMICs), emergency medicine (EM) remains a poorly defined specialty and an unregulated field of clinical practice. Recognition of the attitudes, understanding, and expectations of patients presenting to Indian EDs will be crucial to the continued development of EM as a specialty. This is a multicenter, prospective, cross sectional study of adult and pediatric patients presenting to the ED in three geographically distinct regions of India. Participants were surveyed about their expectations regarding the type of care that they expected to receive, previous treatment options they have utilized, basic understanding of ED operations, factors contributing to their decision to seek ED care, and basic demographic information. 779 patients were approached to participate in the study, of which 698 (90%) completed the survey. Common ways that patients reported learning about the ED were referral from another healthcare provider (45%) and recommendation by a family member (61%). Participants chose the ED was because they thought they would be seen quickly (89%), would receive acute pain management (45%), their regular outpatient care was closed (45%), or were sent by another doctor (45%). Patients expected to wait 0.3 hours (18 minutes) on average to see a doctor in the ED. Over 75% or patients expected to see a specialist consultant in the ED and 12% expected to see their personal physician. Eighty-five percent of patients were triaged as moderate or high acuity, and 74% of patients were admitted. This study found that ED in India is utilized by a population with an extremely high acuity of medical illness that attempts to access healthcare through multiple avenues. Patients most frequently visit the ED due to a referral from another healthcare provider or family member. Most patients are aware of the existence of the ED, though understanding of available services may be lacking. Future research should focus on community outreach and education initiatives on ED services.

Citing Articles

Patients' Expectations in Emergency Department at King Abdulaziz University Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Survey-Based Study.

Bakhribah A, Eissa G, Alsulami D, Alotaibi M, Abdulmannan H, Khojah I Cureus. 2024; 16(2):e54211.

PMID: 38496167 PMC: 10943181. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.54211.

References

Morgan S, Chang A, Alqatari M, Pines J . Non-emergency department interventions to reduce ED utilization: a systematic review. Acad Emerg Med. 2013; 20(10):969-85. PMC: 4038086. DOI: 10.1111/acem.12219. View

Essendi H, Mills S, Fotso J . Barriers to formal emergency obstetric care services' utilization. J Urban Health. 2010; 88 Suppl 2:S356-69. PMC: 3132235. DOI: 10.1007/s11524-010-9481-1. View

Wilson A, Hillman S, Rosato M, Skelton J, Costello A, Hussein J . A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies on maternal emergency transport in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013; 122(3):192-201. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.03.030. View

Qidwai W, Ali S, Baqir M, Ayub S . Patient expectations from an emergency medical service. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2005; 17(3):3-6. View

Lucas R, Sanford S . An analysis of frequent users of emergency care at an urban university hospital. Ann Emerg Med. 1998; 32(5):563-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70033-2. View

Cooke T, Watt D, Wertzler W, Quan H . Patient expectations of emergency department care: phase II--a cross-sectional survey. CJEM. 2007; 8(3):148-57. DOI: 10.1017/s1481803500013658. View

Chan C, Lin W, Yang N, Lai K, Huang H . Pre-emergency-department care-seeking patterns are associated with the severity of presenting condition for emergency department visit and subsequent adverse events: a timeframe episode analysis. PLoS One. 2015; 10(6):e0127793. PMC: 4452693. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127793. View

Bieler G, Paroz S, Faouzi M, Trueb L, Vaucher P, Althaus F . Social and medical vulnerability factors of emergency department frequent users in a universal health insurance system. Acad Emerg Med. 2012; 19(1):63-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01246.x. View

Thompson D, Yarnold P, Williams D, Adams S . Effects of actual waiting time, perceived waiting time, information delivery, and expressive quality on patient satisfaction in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1996; 28(6):657-65. DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70090-2. View

10.

Alpert J, Bauchner H . Care-seeking patterns of inner-city families using an emergency room. A three-decade comparison. Med Care. 1996; 34(12):1171-9. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199612000-00002. View

11.

Cunningham W, Andersen R, Katz M, Stein M, Turner B, Crystal S . The impact of competing subsistence needs and barriers on access to medical care for persons with human immunodeficiency virus receiving care in the United States. Med Care. 1999; 37(12):1270-81. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199912000-00010. View

12.

Kocher K, Meurer W, Desmond J, Nallamothu B . Effect of testing and treatment on emergency department length of stay using a national database. Acad Emerg Med. 2012; 19(5):525-34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01353.x. View

13.

Harris P, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde J . Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2008; 42(2):377-81. PMC: 2700030. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. View

14.

Kobusingye O, Hyder A, Bishai D, Hicks E, Mock C, Joshipura M . Emergency medical systems in low- and middle-income countries: recommendations for action. Bull World Health Organ. 2005; 83(8):626-31. PMC: 2626309. DOI: /S0042-96862005000800017. View

15.

Cham M, Sundby J, Vangen S . Maternal mortality in the rural Gambia, a qualitative study on access to emergency obstetric care. Reprod Health. 2005; 2(1):3. PMC: 1142340. DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-2-3. View

16.

LaCalle E, Rabin E . Frequent users of emergency departments: the myths, the data, and the policy implications. Ann Emerg Med. 2010; 56(1):42-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.01.032. View

17.

Jammeh A, Sundby J, Vangen S . Barriers to emergency obstetric care services in perinatal deaths in rural gambia: a qualitative in-depth interview study. ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 2011:981096. PMC: 3135215. DOI: 10.5402/2011/981096. View

18.

Kraaijvanger N, van Leeuwen H, Rijpsma D, Edwards M . Motives for self-referral to the emergency department: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016; 16(1):685. PMC: 5148909. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1935-z. View

19.

Douglass K, Pousson A, Gidwani S, Smith J . Postgraduate Emergency Medicine Training in India: An Educational Partnership with the Private Sector. J Emerg Med. 2015; 49(5):746-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.03.010. View

20.

Harris P, Taylor R, Minor B, Elliott V, Fernandez M, ONeal L . The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019; 95:103208. PMC: 7254481. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. View