The Psychometric Properties and Clinical Utility of Neural Measures of Reward Processing

Overview

Journal Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci

Specialties Neurology
Social Sciences

Date 2023 Mar 24

PMID 36961734

Authors

Nader Amir

Amanda Holbrook

Emily Meissel

William Taboas

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Reward processing is implicated in the etiology of several psychological conditions including depressive disorders. In the current paper, we examined the psychometric properties of a neural measure of reward processing, the reward positivity (RewP), in 279 adult women at baseline and 187 women 8 weeks later. The RewP demonstrated excellent internal consistency at both timepoints and good test-retest reliability using estimates from both classical test theory and generalizability theory. Additionally, the difference between RewP following reward and loss feedback was marginally associated with depressive symptoms in a subsample of participants. We also examined the relationship between subject-level dependability estimates and depression severity, finding that depressive symptoms may contribute to lower dependability on reward trials. However, this finding did not survive correction for multiple comparisons and should be replicated in future studies. These findings support RewP as a useful measure of individual differences of reward processing and point to the potential utility of this measure for various forms of psychopathology.

References

Hixson H, Burkhouse K, Gorka S, Klumpp H . A preliminary examination of the relation between neural sensitivity to reward and history of alcohol use disorder among adults with internalizing psychopathologies. Neurosci Lett. 2018; 690:17-22. PMC: 6320293. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.10.003. View

Clayson P, Brush C, Hajcak G . Data quality and reliability metrics for event-related potentials (ERPs): The utility of subject-level reliability. Int J Psychophysiol. 2021; 165:121-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.04.004. View

Distefano A, Jackson F, Levinson A, Infantolino Z, Jarcho J, Nelson B . A comparison of the electrocortical response to monetary and social reward. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2018; 13(3):247-255. PMC: 5836277. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsy006. View

Bress J, Meyer A, Proudfit G . The stability of the feedback negativity and its relationship with depression during childhood and adolescence. Dev Psychopathol. 2015; 27(4 Pt 1):1285-94. DOI: 10.1017/S0954579414001400. View

. Current depression among adults---United States, 2006 and 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010; 59(38):1229-35. View

Pizzagalli D, Holmes A, Dillon D, Goetz E, Birk J, Bogdan R . Reduced caudate and nucleus accumbens response to rewards in unmedicated individuals with major depressive disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2009; 166(6):702-10. PMC: 2735451. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08081201. View

McGhie S, Holbrook A, Arienzo D, Amir N . Psychometric properties of the late positive potential in adult females. Biol Psychol. 2021; 163:108145. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108145. View

Carpenter B, Gelman A, Hoffman M, Lee D, Goodrich B, Betancourt M . Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language. J Stat Softw. 2022; 76. PMC: 9788645. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v076.i01. View

Proudfit G, Bress J, Foti D, Kujawa A, Klein D . Depression and Event-related Potentials: Emotional disengagement and reward insensitivity. Curr Opin Psychol. 2015; 4:110-113. PMC: 4598954. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.12.018. View

10.

Kasch K, Rottenberg J, Arnow B, Gotlib I . Behavioral activation and inhibition systems and the severity and course of depression. J Abnorm Psychol. 2002; 111(4):589-97. DOI: 10.1037//0021-843x.111.4.589. View

11.

Delorme A, Makeig S . EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods. 2004; 134(1):9-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009. View

12.

Luking K, Nelson B, Infantolino Z, Sauder C, Hajcak G . Internal Consistency of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Electroencephalography Measures of Reward in Late Childhood and Early Adolescence. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2017; 2(3):289-297. PMC: 5647886. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2016.12.004. View

13.

Clayson P, Carbine K, Baldwin S, Olsen J, Larson M . Using generalizability theory and the ERP Reliability Analysis (ERA) Toolbox for assessing test-retest reliability of ERP scores part 1: Algorithms, framework, and implementation. Int J Psychophysiol. 2021; 166:174-187. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.01.006. View

14.

Ethridge P, Weinberg A . Psychometric properties of neural responses to monetary and social rewards across development. Int J Psychophysiol. 2018; 132(Pt B):311-322. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.01.011. View

15.

Wang Y, Gorenstein C . Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II: a comprehensive review. Braz J Psychiatry. 2014; 35(4):416-31. DOI: 10.1590/1516-4446-2012-1048. View

16.

Foti D, Hajcak G . State sadness reduces neural sensitivity to nonrewards versus rewards. Neuroreport. 2009; 21(2):143-7. DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283356448. View

17.

Levinson A, Speed B, Infantolino Z, Hajcak G . Reliability of the electrocortical response to gains and losses in the doors task. Psychophysiology. 2017; 54(4):601-607. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12813. View

18.

Santopetro N, Brush C, Burani K, Bruchnak A, Hajcak G . Doors P300 moderates the relationship between reward positivity and current depression status in adults. J Affect Disord. 2021; 294:776-785. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.091. View

19.

Tavakol M, Dennick R . Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2016; 2:53-55. PMC: 4205511. DOI: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd. View

20.

Hajcak G, Klawohn J, Meyer A . The Utility of Event-Related Potentials in Clinical Psychology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019; 15:71-95. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095457. View