» Articles » PMID: 36961572

Computed Tomography Density Changes of Bone Metastases After Concomitant Denosumab

Overview
Journal Skeletal Radiol
Specialties Orthopedics
Radiology
Date 2023 Mar 24
PMID 36961572
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate bone density changes at the level of normal trabecular bone and bone metastases (BMs) after denosumab (DM) treatment in oncologic patients.

Materials And Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 31 consecutive adult patients with histologically confirmed solid tumors with at least one newly diagnosed bone metastatic lesion detected at CT. Patients received treatment with DM, 120 mg subcutaneous every 28 days for at least 6 months. Bone density was determined at the level of BMs and at the level of normal trabecular bone of lumbar vertebrae using a region of interest (ROI)-based approach.

Results: A progressive increase in CT bone density was demonstrated at the level of normal trabecular bone at 6 months (18% ± 5%) and 12 months (23% ± 7%) after the treatment begins. BMs showed a significant increase in CT bone density (p < 0.05) as compared to baseline after 6 months (57% ± 15%) and 12 months (1.06 ± 0.25 times higher) after treatment.

Conclusion: We have found that long-term treatment with DM increases bone density progressively in oncologic patients. This effect can be observed not only at the level of secondary lesions but also at the level of apparently normal trabecular bone and is more pronounced for osteolytic metastases.

Citing Articles

Trabecular Attenuation of L1 in Adult Patients with Multiple Myeloma: An Observational Study on Low-Dose CT Images.

Mallio C, Tomarchio V, Pulcini F, Verducci E, Bernetti C, Tafuri M Hematol Rep. 2024; 16(4):624-635.

PMID: 39449304 PMC: 11503432. DOI: 10.3390/hematolrep16040061.


Exploring the interplay between paraspinal muscular status and bone health in osteoporosis and fracture risk: a comprehensive literature review on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies.

Mallio C, Volterrani C, Bernetti C, Stiffi M, Greco F, Zobel B Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(6):4189-4201.

PMID: 38846277 PMC: 11151258. DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-1770.

References
1.
Tubiana-Hulin M . Incidence, prevalence and distribution of bone metastases. Bone. 1991; 12 Suppl 1:S9-10. DOI: 10.1016/8756-3282(91)90059-r. View

2.
Cosimo Quattrocchi C, Errante Y, Mallio C, Santini D, Tonini G, Zobel B . Brain metastatic volume and white matter lesions in advanced cancer patients. J Neurooncol. 2013; 113(3):451-8. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-013-1137-z. View

3.
Mundy G . Metastasis to bone: causes, consequences and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002; 2(8):584-93. DOI: 10.1038/nrc867. View

4.
Coleman R . Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity. Clin Cancer Res. 2006; 12(20 Pt 2):6243s-6249s. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0931. View

5.
Hill M, Richards M, Gregory W, Smith P, Rubens R . Spinal cord compression in breast cancer: a review of 70 cases. Br J Cancer. 1993; 68(5):969-73. PMC: 1968743. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1993.463. View