» Articles » PMID: 36951246

X-chromosome Target Specificity Diverged Between Dosage Compensation Mechanisms of Two Closely Related Caenorhabditis Species

Overview
Journal Elife
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Mar 23
PMID 36951246
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An evolutionary perspective enhances our understanding of biological mechanisms. Comparison of sex determination and X-chromosome dosage compensation mechanisms between the closely related nematode species () and () revealed that the genetic regulatory hierarchy controlling both processes is conserved, but the X-chromosome target specificity and mode of binding for the specialized condensin dosage compensation complex (DCC) controlling X expression have diverged. We identified two motifs within DCC recruitment sites that are highly enriched on X: 13 bp MEX and 30 bp MEX II. Mutating either MEX or MEX II in an endogenous recruitment site with multiple copies of one or both motifs reduced binding, but only removing all motifs eliminated binding in vivo. Hence, DCC binding to recruitment sites appears additive. In contrast, DCC binding to recruitment sites is synergistic: mutating even one motif in vivo eliminated binding. Although all X-chromosome motifs share the sequence CAGGG, they have otherwise diverged so that a motif from one species cannot function in the other. Functional divergence was demonstrated in vivo and in vitro. A single nucleotide position in MEX can determine whether DCC binds. This rapid divergence of DCC target specificity could have been an important factor in establishing reproductive isolation between nematode species and contrasts dramatically with the conservation of target specificity for X-chromosome dosage compensation across species and for transcription factors controlling developmental processes such as body-plan specification from fruit flies to mice.

Citing Articles

SMC-mediated dosage compensation in evolved in the presence of an ancestral nematode mechanism.

Aharonoff A, Kim J, Washington A, Ercan S bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38826443 PMC: 11142195. DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.21.595224.


The impact of differential transposition activities of autonomous and nonautonomous hAT transposable elements on genome architecture and gene expression in Caenorhabditis inopinata.

Hatanaka R, Tamagawa K, Haruta N, Sugimoto A Genetics. 2024; 227(2).

PMID: 38577765 PMC: 11492494. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyae052.

References
1.
Zhong M, Niu W, Lu Z, Sarov M, Murray J, Janette J . Genome-wide identification of binding sites defines distinct functions for Caenorhabditis elegans PHA-4/FOXA in development and environmental response. PLoS Genet. 2010; 6(2):e1000848. PMC: 2824807. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000848. View

2.
Csankovszki G, McDonel P, Meyer B . Recruitment and spreading of the C. elegans dosage compensation complex along X chromosomes. Science. 2004; 303(5661):1182-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.1092938. View

3.
Sun S, Ting C, Wu C . The normal function of a speciation gene, Odysseus, and its hybrid sterility effect. Science. 2004; 305(5680):81-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.1093904. View

4.
Ludwiczak J, Winski A, Szczepaniak K, Alva V, Dunin-Horkawicz S . DeepCoil-a fast and accurate prediction of coiled-coil domains in protein sequences. Bioinformatics. 2019; 35(16):2790-2795. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty1062. View

5.
Schloop A, Bandodkar P, Reeves G . Formation, interpretation, and regulation of the Drosophila Dorsal/NF-κB gradient. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2020; 137:143-191. DOI: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2019.11.007. View