» Articles » PMID: 36944356

Residual Venous Obstruction As an Indicator of Clinical Outcomes Following Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Management Study

Overview
Journal Thromb Haemost
Publisher Thieme
Date 2023 Mar 21
PMID 36944356
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background:  Residual venous obstruction (RVO) is considered a risk factor of recurrence and possibly other clinical outcomes following deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Current guidelines do not support an RVO-tailored duration of anticoagulant therapy; contemporary data of such management strategies are scarce. We aimed to evaluate an RVO-based management strategy and to assess associations of RVO with recurrence, post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), arterial events and cancer. To gain further insight, D-dimer levels were measured 1 month after stopping anticoagulant therapy.

Methods:  Consecutive patients with symptomatic, proximal DVT were treated in a 2-year clinical care pathway (CCP) at Maastricht University Medical Center and were followed up to 5 years. RVO was assessed at the end of regular duration of anticoagulant therapy, which was extended once if RVO was detected. The study was approved by the medical ethics committee.

Result:  From a total of 825 patients, 804 patients (97.5%) completed the CCP and 755 (93.9%) were available for extended follow-up. Most patients (76.5%) stopped anticoagulant therapy. Incidence rates of recurrence, PTS, arterial events, and cancer were 4.4, 11.9, 1.7, and 1.8 per 100 patient-years, respectively. RVO was independently associated with PTS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.66 [1.19-2.32]) and arterial events (HR: 2.07 [1.18-3.65]), but not with recurrence or cancer. High D-dimer was associated with recurrence (HR: 3.51 [2.24-5.48]).

Conclusion:  Our RVO-based management strategy might have attenuated the association of RVO with recurrence. In addition, RVO identified patients at increased risk of PTS and arterial events, which might be used to identify patients in need of alternative treatment strategies.

Citing Articles

Expert-Based Narrative Review on Compression UltraSonography (CUS) for Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT).

DOria M, Girardi L, Amgad A, Sherif M, Piffaretti G, Ruaro B Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(1.

PMID: 39795610 PMC: 11720716. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15010082.

References
1.
Donadini M, Ageno W, Antonucci E, Cosmi B, Kovacs M, Le Gal G . Prognostic significance of residual venous obstruction in patients with treated unprovoked deep vein thrombosis: a patient-level meta-analysis. Thromb Haemost. 2013; 111(1):172-9. DOI: 10.1160/TH13-04-0336. View

2.
Palareti G, Cosmi B, Legnani C, Antonucci E, De Micheli V, Ghirarduzzi A . D-dimer to guide the duration of anticoagulation in patients with venous thromboembolism: a management study. Blood. 2014; 124(2):196-203. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-01-548065. View

3.
Ten Cate V, Lensing A, Weitz J, Beyer-Westendorf J, Wells P, Mismetti P . Extended anticoagulant therapy in venous thromboembolism: a balanced, fractional factorial, clinical vignette-based study. Haematologica. 2019; 104(10):e474-e477. PMC: 6886408. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2018.209924. View

4.
Prins M, Guillemin I, Gilet H, Gabriel S, Essers B, Raskob G . Scoring and psychometric validation of the Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire (PACT-Q). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009; 7:30. PMC: 2686675. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-30. View

5.
Ageno W, Samperiz A, Caballero R, Dentali F, Di Micco P, Prandoni P . Duration of anticoagulation after venous thromboembolism in real world clinical practice. Thromb Res. 2015; 135(4):666-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.02.001. View