» Articles » PMID: 36943776

Diversity of Woodland Strawberry Inflorescences Arises from Heterochrony Regulated by TERMINAL FLOWER 1 and FLOWERING LOCUS T

Overview
Journal Plant Cell
Specialties Biology
Cell Biology
Date 2023 Mar 21
PMID 36943776
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A vast variety of inflorescence architectures have evolved in angiosperms. Here, we analyze the diversity and development of the woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca) inflorescence. Contrary to historical classifications, we show that it is a closed thyrse: a compound inflorescence with determinate primary monopodial axis and lateral sympodial branches, thus combining features of racemes and cymes. We demonstrate that this architecture is generated by 2 types of inflorescence meristems differing in their geometry. We further show that woodland strawberry homologs of TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (FvTFL1) and FLOWERING LOCUS T (FvFT1) regulate the development of both the racemose and cymose components of the thyrse. Loss of functional FvTFL1 reduces the number of lateral branches of the main axis and iterations in the lateral branches but does not affect their cymose pattern. These changes can be enhanced or compensated by altering FvFT1 expression. We complement our experimental findings with a computational model that captures inflorescence development using a small set of rules. The model highlights the distinct regulation of the fate of the primary and higher-order meristems, and explains the phenotypic diversity among inflorescences in terms of heterochrony resulting from the opposite action of FvTFL1 and FvFT1 within the thyrse framework. Our results represent a detailed analysis of thyrse architecture development at the meristematic and molecular levels.

Citing Articles

Developmental timing in plants.

Coen E, Prusinkiewicz P Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):2674.

PMID: 38531864 PMC: 10965974. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-46941-1.


From the archives: Tales from evolution-inflorescence diversity, gene duplication, and chromatin-mediated gene regulation.

Sanchez-Munoz R Plant Cell. 2024; 36(6):2048-2050.

PMID: 38513607 PMC: 11132890. DOI: 10.1093/plcell/koae092.


How flower development genes were identified using forward genetic screens in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Smyth D Genetics. 2023; 224(4).

PMID: 37294732 PMC: 10411571. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyad102.

References
1.
Pnueli L, Carmel-Goren L, Hareven D, Gutfinger T, Alvarez J, Ganal M . The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1. Development. 1998; 125(11):1979-89. DOI: 10.1242/dev.125.11.1979. View

2.
Zhu Y, Klasfeld S, Jeong C, Jin R, Goto K, Yamaguchi N . TERMINAL FLOWER 1-FD complex target genes and competition with FLOWERING LOCUS T. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):5118. PMC: 7550357. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18782-1. View

3.
Hecht V, Laurie R, Vander Schoor J, Ridge S, Knowles C, Liew L . The pea GIGAS gene is a FLOWERING LOCUS T homolog necessary for graft-transmissible specification of flowering but not for responsiveness to photoperiod. Plant Cell. 2011; 23(1):147-61. PMC: 3051257. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.110.081042. View

4.
Jamilena M, Zurita S, Gomez P, Capel J, Lozano R . FALSIFLORA, the tomato orthologue of FLORICAULA and LEAFY, controls flowering time and floral meristem identity. Plant J. 2000; 20(6):685-93. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00641.x. View

5.
Harder L, Prusinkiewicz P . The interplay between inflorescence development and function as the crucible of architectural diversity. Ann Bot. 2012; 112(8):1477-93. PMC: 3828939. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcs252. View